Atradees
Well-known member
Cody will have to take Bobos 3 or 4 reps.
I don't think they can offer less money than the tender value, and it's guaranteed. Maybe you mean incentives? That would make sense.I expect the Jaguars offer to be for less money but to include some guarantees. The Seahawks were likely trying to bring him back to compete for a roster spot without any guarantees.
we will extend him this season (JSN)Well, I'm sorry we'll lose JSN after next season, but after we make bobo the highest paid receiver to keep him, we won't be able to afford JSN.
Cody will have to take Bobos 3 or 4 reps.
RFA tags are an extension of the current contract which isn't guaranteed. Bobo is entitled to sign any FA deal he wishes to sign. He can sign for less money with more guarantees if that is what he and another team agree upon. For historical reference in 2019 the Rams had a RB, (Malcolm Brown), become a RFA. The Rams tagged him at $2.025M. The Rams likely didn't intend to pay him that money but wanted him to compete for a back-up role. They would then likely have offered him significantly less with the threat of releasing him just before the start of the season if he didn't agree. Brown agreed to a Lions offer sheet of $3.3M over 2 years with about $1.6M in the 1st year, but the 1st year was guaranteed. The Rams agreed to match the Lions offer.I don't think they can offer less money than the tender value, and it's guaranteed. Maybe you mean incentives? That would make sense.
Don't think we match that
If the Seahawks don't match the Jag's offer for Bobo, there's Bobo 2.0 in 2026 draft. His name is Chase Roberts.
We kid a lot around here about Bobo, but fact that they tendered him says he has value to the team beyond his stats.Jacksonville is helping set the market for Bobo.
That another team is interested in a quality player that brings so much to team culture is of little surprise to me.
Hypothetically dont we save .52m in ‘26 assuming we got him back on his tender?We tendered him at $3.52 million in 2026. What makes you think we aren’t willing to pay that for two years (assuming he makes the incentives)?
Hypothetically dont we save .52m in ‘26 assuming we got him back on his tender?