He just doesn't have the really long runs he used to. Id have to look up the numbers but his really long runs are down significantly from his first 2 years.Walker is feast or famine back. And he can pretty much only run to the outside.
He is good when he gets to the edge but he is a very flawed back. I doubt anything is wrong with him - he just either breaks out for a big gain or gives you little to nothing.
Auditioning for Dancing With the StarsWhat the heck was that run?
If there are holes they can hire meLol, jesus, dude literally has zero holes or run lanes, amd its his fault somehow. let's put the blame where it belongs. Play calling and the OLine.![]()
So...great running backs are incalculable of making something happen without perfect OL play.Lol, jesus, dude literally has zero holes or run lanes, amd its his fault somehow. let's put the blame where it belongs. Play calling and the OLine.![]()
Charbs is worse. Charbs is better at getting 2-3. And Charbs is better at pass pro (but more Walker is much worse). But neither back is going to get you 4 very often. Maybe on a screen pass.Not a fan of this guy. Give me Charbs!!
Calling this line play less than perfect in the biggest understatement today. Let's call it what it really is so far. Straight garbage.So...great running backs are incalculable of making something happen without perfect OL play.![]()
They do seem to become stinky refuse at the most inopportune times.Calling this line play less than perfect in the biggest understatement today. Let's call it what it really is so far. Straight garbage.