Could the Seahawks trade for Maxx Crosby?

MoldyPurpleMayo

Tastes like TV static
Supporting Member
Joined
Sep 8, 2021
Messages
3,144
Reaction score
3,323
Seattle has something special with JSN!

JSN might be the best WR right now in the entire NFL!

I believe JSN and Puka and you now include Egbuka, as thee Top 3 WR in the NFL.
Oh that meme was only for the first sentence, I wouldn't trade JSN for ANYONE right now
 

Glasgow Seahawk

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 5, 2013
Messages
3,120
Reaction score
1,724
I think the Raiders would want a haul for him. Kind of hesitant as we still have a few holes at linebacker, corner (if Woolen goes at EOY) and guard (the offensive line is looking better this year but the depth is scary). What is the draft looking like for DE?
 

BirdsCommaAngry

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 13, 2013
Messages
1,744
Reaction score
850
Hasselbeck and Williams weren't perennial pro-bowler/all-pro players when we traded for them (not "big names" who require at least a 1st round pick or comparable value like Crosby). Duane Brown was and he worked out but Percy Harvin, Sheldon Richardson, Jimmy Graham, and Jamal Adams did not. The exception doesn't disprove the rule IMO. (We were also much more successful as sellers for our big names when shipping out RW and Frank Clark.)

For whatever reason, fans can commonly accept that signing the big names and most expensive players in FA generally isn't a good way to build a contender. However, when those same type of players are rumored to be available via trade, we're still interested despite the cost being even higher. It's wild.
 
Last edited:
N

NoGain

Guest
Hasselbeck and Williams weren't perennial pro-bowler/all-pro players when we traded for them (not "big names" who require at least a 1st round pick or comparable value like Crosby). Duane Brown was and he worked out but Percy Harvin, Sheldon Richardson, Jimmy Graham, and Jamal Adams did not. The exception doesn't disprove the rule IMO. (We were also much more successful as sellers for our big names when shipping out RW and Frank Clark.)

For whatever reason, fans can commonly accept that signing the big names and most expensive players in FA generally isn't a good way to build a contender. However, when those same type of players are rumored to be available via trade, we're still interested despite the cost being even higher. It's wild.
I think it's tough to make rock solid generalizations about signing marque FA's or trading for them. I agree that it's probably not a good way to build a team, but it can make for an effective addition to a team at the right time. Also, when discussing such a topic, criteria is important, as in who makes for such a star player, and what makes for such a successful trade or signing of such a star player.

Sheldon Richardson doesn't really fit the criteria you put forth for such a star player, whereas I'd agree with you about Adams and Harvin and Graham. And you could make a good argument that the Chiefs trade for Clark worked out well for them, as it helped them win two Super Bowls. The RW trade was an obvious disaster for the Broncos.

There are definitely trades for star players that I think worked out well for the teams that traded for them:

--Rams trade for Jalen Ramsey
--Cowboys trade for Charles Haley
--Rams trade for Stafford
--Dolphins trade for Paul Warfield
--Raiders trade for Ted Hendricks
--Eagles trade for AJ Brown
--(pending) Packers trade for Parsons

And there have been big FA signings that panned out well:

--Packers signing Reggie White
--49ers signing Deion Sanders
--Cowboys signing Deion Sanders
--TB signing Tom Brady
--Redskins signing Wilber Marshall
--Patriots signing Rodney Harrison
--Rams signing Andrew Whitworth

There's more disappointments than successes, but some worked out well. I guess it all depends.
 

IndyHawk

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 19, 2013
Messages
10,105
Reaction score
3,715
Give them next year's 1 with Lock and Milroe to fix their QB situation.
200
 

glenwo2

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 12, 2025
Messages
6,234
Reaction score
7,242
In that article @glenwo2 posted somewhere with Pete’s comments after their loss to the colts, Pete said they need more practice, more reps, he said Maxx Crosby needs more reps….
I don't recall posting an article about that. :unsure:
 

Sperrydogg

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 1, 2023
Messages
8,106
Reaction score
6,332
Location
Port Angeles Washington in the mountains
I don't recall posting an article about that. :unsure:
Somebody did I just read it about Pete explaining the 40-6 loss

Oh it was @seabowl


I just imagined it was you @glenwo2 cause you post a lot of articles

I guess my point was that Pete saying maxx needs to practice is fighting words, if Las Vegas doesn’t want to trade him Pete shouldn’t be blaming their loss on his lack of practice time
 
Last edited:

Frank12

Captain Electron
Joined
Aug 13, 2021
Messages
949
Reaction score
1,012
I don't see the Raiders trading Crosby he is their best player, and a fan favorite.. If they trade him Mark Davis & Pete better up their personal security services because those insane fans might might do something crazy... 😂
 

Latest posts

Top