Geno and DK on the outs?

toffee

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 9, 2016
Messages
13,392
Reaction score
9,111
Location
SoCal Desert
In case of a rebuild:
  1. DK is one of the very few Seahawks that has trade value if we are going for a rebuild, DK will go.
  2. Geno is a low cost vet QB with a year left on his contract. It would be wise to extend his contract on the cheap and have him for the next couple of years until our future QB is ready.
 

Maelstrom787

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 28, 2011
Messages
13,434
Reaction score
12,654
Location
Delaware
Players get frustrated so I'm not sure there's actually beef there. Regardless, we know DK to be highly emotional. This works in our favor, at times. It works against us at other times (and I'm not sure it'd ever work again without Pete there, as he was the type of coach that knew how to gas up a volatile player and juice their best play out of them).

I'm not sure that Mike is especially keen on DK's type. He craves discipline and structure. His comments about the INTs and calling them "Team interceptions" leads me to believe he was not a fan of DK blowing that route and causing that second INT.

If there was ever a time I felt like DK could be traded, it's this year prior to the deadline. The Chiefs make sense, and they've got two stud guards. One of them is 25, iron-man healthy, and a top-15 guard in the NFL easily - and they're about to have to pay him. Meanwhile, at WR, the cupboard is pretty much bare outside of Rice and some younger "potential" types.

I have never wanted DK traded. I believe he's a rare type of WR - the physical unicorn. I think great teams usually collect as many "unicorn" types as they can and try to marry them into a cohesive on-field product. If they do trade DK, though, it should be imminently, and hopefully we can get the Chiefs to cough up Trey Smith and a sweetener, say a third and fifth rounder.
 

hgwellz12

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 14, 2012
Messages
8,927
Reaction score
4,030
Location
In a lofty place tanglin' with Satan over history.
After the game, Smith said he threw the pass, and it was a bad play by him. When pressed further about other plays, such as DK Metcalf's inability to land both feet in the end zone on a well-thrown Metcalf pass, Smith said, "Watch the film, man. Watch the film. You'll see it." That implies he thinks Metcalf could have done better.

Articles are increasingly starting to seem like, A) Shitty, piss poor click-bait writing by lazy ass "journalists", or, B) Shitty, piss poor A.I. generated click-bait articles by lazy ass "journalists". And I don't even know, right now, which is worse but I'm not ok with any of it. The moment I spot the bullshit, every subsequent WORD is rendered instantly pointless and invalid. We are SPEEDING towards a cliff as a species. And, yes, I am aware of how dramatic and hyperbolic that may sound, but at this rate our grandkids will not be able to assume anything in the world is genuine.
 

hgwellz12

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 14, 2012
Messages
8,927
Reaction score
4,030
Location
In a lofty place tanglin' with Satan over history.
Seattle needs to extend at least one of the players, if not both. If Metcalf and Smith are having long-term communication problems, though, that could imply they are not going to work well together for the next several seasons.

Word? I don't know, but that just seems like something a robot would say.
 

Fresno Hawk

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 8, 2021
Messages
851
Reaction score
795
If we do end up rebuilding. Trading Dk will help, we should be able to get good value for him. There would be no reason keeping Geno if that's the case, might aswell start from scratch and save the money. These next 6 games will be telling.
 

toffee

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 9, 2016
Messages
13,392
Reaction score
9,111
Location
SoCal Desert
The next three games will be telling. Will our players' spirit change from indifferent to fired up? Will our scheme on offense be more to the players' strength? We may face a total rebuild if no changes in the next three games.
 

knownone

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 7, 2010
Messages
5,805
Reaction score
2,953
In context, Geno is basically saying, "We're not executing well in general." He's not singling out Metcalf or anyone else in particular. Earlier in the press conference, he took the blame for the interception, where Metcalf likely ran the wrong route. So, the writer randomly connects two unrelated incidents and sandwiches them together.
 

toffee

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 9, 2016
Messages
13,392
Reaction score
9,111
Location
SoCal Desert
He's good but not elite good.. I still cannot believe how bad he is at high pointing
the ball and the lazy route running is unacceptable to me.
Is that how the game is today, just play when you feel up to it?

I felt like it's hard for anyone except the coaches and players to judge if a route was executed right or wrong. I know for sure that I can't tell if a WR ran the wrong route or he was delayed a split second by a CB or the QB throw the ball too early or too late etc.

One thing me as a fan can sometimes tell would be if a WR was open.
 

Glasgow Seahawk

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 5, 2013
Messages
2,165
Reaction score
721
He's good but not elite good.. I still cannot believe how bad he is at high pointing
the ball and the lazy route running is unacceptable to me.
Is that how the game is today, just play when you feel up to it?
How many super bowl winners pay their receivers mega contracts? I can't think of too many. The Chiefs don't. I'm not sure how much Kupp was making for the Rams but guessing it wasn't near the top, not sure Mike Evans was at Tampa.

Feel like these days its trenches, pass rush, QB to get deep in the play offs and I think thats why teams like Seattle, Dallas, Arizona fall short by spending too much on the skill positions.
 
Top