I think the Seahawks were sniped at 5

Natethegreat

Well-known member
Joined
May 7, 2012
Messages
2,566
Reaction score
392
I really think the Seahawks were targeting Will Anderson or Anthony Richardson at 5. The Seahawks targeting a smallish CB at 5 is so far outside of the norm for this teams philosophy. (I'm not saying they don't really really like this guy obviously they do).
For me AR being taken by Indy was a real gut punch and I bet it was for the Seahawks as well.
 

James in PA

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 4, 2013
Messages
4,893
Reaction score
4,670
AR at 5 was a gut punch for me too. Not so much WA, who I feel will be good but not a Bosa type.

I said all along if they absolutely loved Richardson, they MUST trade up and not "hope" that someone else won't take him. I had a very strong feeling it would be Indy too. I wasn't buying the Levis to Indy talk at all.

I don't know if we'll ever know the truth about our true feelings for AR.
 

GGotskill

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 28, 2022
Messages
742
Reaction score
641
I really think the Seahawks were targeting Will Anderson or Anthony Richardson at 5. The Seahawks targeting a smallish CB at 5 is so far outside of the norm for this teams philosophy. (I'm not saying they don't really really like this guy obviously they do).
For me AR being taken by Indy was a real gut punch and I bet it was for the Seahawks as well.

Devon Witherspoon was one of two players they wanted at that 5th pick. Not sure it was a gut punch to land a top 2 player on your draft board.
 

WarHawks

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 16, 2012
Messages
1,901
Reaction score
1,459
If they were sniped, then yes, I agree they should have moved up to get him. But, they decided not to force the issue. Now we still have no long term answer at qbotf. If they grab one in the middle rounds, that doesn't exactly inspire confidence either. And next year we will likely be picking in the 20's. So, not sure what their long term strategy is for qb. No idea whatsoever.
 
OP
OP
N

Natethegreat

Well-known member
Joined
May 7, 2012
Messages
2,566
Reaction score
392
If you were the Cardinals do you want to trade for Houstons next year round one pick or ours? No way they would trade with us. Especially with a potential franchise changing QB there (in your own division no less). I don't think it was even an option for the Seahawks to trade up.
 

WarHawks

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 16, 2012
Messages
1,901
Reaction score
1,459
If you were the Cardinals do you want to trade for Houstons next year rond one pick or ours? No way they would trade with us. Especially with a potential franchise changing QB there. I don't think it was even an option for the Seahawks to trade up.
Probably true.
 

SeAhAwKeR4life

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 20, 2009
Messages
7,710
Reaction score
1,537
Location
Port Townsend, WA
Maybe they were, but I doubt they had their hearts set on Richardson or we'd have seen more effort to move up.

As I said in another thread, Hendon Hooker, Will Levis and Clayton Tune all still available at QB all possible starter material.
 

hoxrox

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 5, 2009
Messages
3,299
Reaction score
1,972
Or, maybe Witherspoon was the guy they were targeting all along. Who really knows.

Does the OP have any specific stats or analysis to support this opinion?
Don't think he was. Otherwise, it wouldn't have taken up so much clock to finally pick him. They fielded calls to trade down and didn't get the value they wanted. Witherspoon was their next best player. But not the player they really wanted with that pick.
 

GGotskill

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 28, 2022
Messages
742
Reaction score
641
Don't think he was. Otherwise, it wouldn't have taken up so much clock to finally pick him. They fielded calls to trade down and didn't get the value they wanted. Witherspoon was their next best player. But not the player they really wanted with that pick.

PCJS said he was one of two players they wanted to take at that spot. They had offers to trade down, no one was going to offer enough to move them off that spot. Now you can either take them at their word, or not. Anything else is just baseless speculation.
 

Jerhawk

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 22, 2010
Messages
6,249
Reaction score
3,104
Location
Spokane, WA
Don't think he was. Otherwise, it wouldn't have taken up so much clock to finally pick him. They fielded calls to trade down and didn't get the value they wanted. Witherspoon was their next best player. But not the player they really wanted with that pick.
Them fielding calls means they were exploring all potential options. Maybe they were on the phone with him for a moment.

Again, unless any of you have legitimate evidence to the contrary, these are all baseless speculations, potentially inaccurate opinions and hurt feelings at this point

Witherspoon is a Seahawk.

If I'm not allowed to state my opinions, don't see how other posters are allowed to get away with it
 

hoxrox

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 5, 2009
Messages
3,299
Reaction score
1,972
PCJS said he was one of two players they wanted to take at that spot. They had offers to trade down, no one was going to offer enough to move them off that spot. Now you can either take them at their word, or not. Anything else is just baseless speculation.
Right, he was one of TWO players they wanted at 5. So who was the other player? Anderson? Richardson?
 
OP
OP
N

Natethegreat

Well-known member
Joined
May 7, 2012
Messages
2,566
Reaction score
392
Again, trading up was not an option most likely. Texans were not trading their pick and Cardinals were not going to trade with us when they had an outstanding option with the Texans. Indy was set on picking a QB and unfortunately they took AR.
Also as has been pointed out the Seahawks waited the full 10 minutes to put in their selection, like every last second of it. No reason to do that unless they wanted to see what trade down options might come.
 

Sgt. Largent

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 1, 2012
Messages
25,560
Reaction score
7,612
I really think the Seahawks were targeting Will Anderson or Anthony Richardson at 5. The Seahawks targeting a smallish CB at 5 is so far outside of the norm for this teams philosophy. (I'm not saying they don't really really like this guy obviously they do).
For me AR being taken by Indy was a real gut punch and I bet it was for the Seahawks as well.

The Hawks knew the odds were against them with either AR or Anderson being there at 5.

Yeah Houston trading back up to grab Anderson was a surprise, but you have to figure Arizona would have drafted him anyway if the couldn't trade out.

I would have preferred Anderson, but I'm just fine with Witherspoon. He's an absolute baller and fits the Hawk mold of skill, bully and loves the game.
 
OP
OP
N

Natethegreat

Well-known member
Joined
May 7, 2012
Messages
2,566
Reaction score
392
Or, maybe Witherspoon was the guy they were targeting all along. Who really knows.

Does the OP have any specific stats or analysis to support this opinion?
I have given at least three reasons why I think this is true. Yes its an opinion, but I did give the reasons why I have them.
 
Last edited:
Top