ImTheScientist
Well-known member
- Joined
- Oct 2, 2012
- Messages
- 3,726
- Reaction score
- 64
Who’s with me?
ok, I shall join the fan club, you and me are the founding members lol.Who’s with me?
It would not have made a difference. Poor coaching via Fangio and Schurmer would have turned Wilson into a former NFL QB looking for a backup jobok, I shall join the fan club, you and me are the founding members lol.
Lock is a slower, and less accurate Russ; Lock is also a taller, and more coachable Russ. They both haven't master the art of throwing with anticipation over the middle. Both Russ and Lock own strong arms that could go deep.
Just for fun, if Lock time travel back to joining the Hawks in 2012, with Lynch and that defense, could he do well? quite intriguing. Similarly, if Russ were to time travel and join the Broncos three years ago, would Broncos still suffer having to change OC three times?
But this is Russell Wilson, unlimited dangeruss, who single handedly saved Pete Carroll's coaching career.It would not have made a difference. Poor coaching via Fangio and Schurmer would have turned Wilson into a former NFL QB looking for a backup job
The fact is that Wilson was vastly more prepared for the NFL as a rookie than almost any other QB coming out. Comparing him to almost any other rookie QB is not going to be favorable to the other. The problem with Wilson is after he completed the coaching to get to where he was a complete passer in 2015, he decided to regress to the QB we saw the past two seasons.But this is Russell Wilson, unlimited dangeruss, who single handedly saved Pete Carroll's coaching career.
YEP ^ 100%
Don't forget a new signal caller on the line which affects everything. Hopefully they can gel quickly. A line with good chemistry and rapport can make a promising season into a special one.For Lock, I can think of how Hawks situation may help him or not:
Good:
Good receiving Corp. From Lockett to DK and down, all had good speed. And two proven 1000 yard WRs.
TE are good too,
RBs could be very good with Penny and Walker but Penny has injury history, Walker is a rookie.
Not so good:
OC is still unproven after a single season. Right after Waldron was hired, his star QB announced that he had no confidence in Hawks' coaching, and Russ basically did his own things. We saw a bit of Waldron's offense though Geno.
OL is questionable too, a pair of rookie bookends, new OL coach and new zoom scheme.
The OL, health of RB and OC remain my biggest concern. If all work great, Lock could have a new career or at least be our Dilfer.Don't forget a new signal caller on the line which affects everything. Hopefully they can gel quickly. A line with good chemistry and rapport can make a promising season into a special one.
Sounds like Russ didn’t want to play in a more structured offense even though the WCO is very QB friendly.For Lock, I can think of how Hawks situation may help him or not:
Good:
Good receiving Corp. From Lockett to DK and down, all had good speed. And two proven 1000 yard WRs.
TE are good too,
RBs could be very good with Penny and Walker but Penny has injury history, Walker is a rookie.
Not so good:
OC is still unproven after a single season. Right after Waldron was hired, his star QB announced that he had no confidence in Hawks' coaching, and Russ basically did his own things. We saw a bit of Waldron's offense though Geno.
OL is questionable too, a pair of rookie bookends, new OL coach and new zoom scheme.
You are probably right, but regardless of why, we ended up not getting to see a lot of Waldron system.Sounds like Russ didn’t want to play in a more structured offense even though the WCO is very QB friendly.
We did see it in opener and in last game.You are probably right, but regardless of why, we ended up not getting to see a lot of Waldron system.