Register    Login    Forum    Search    FAQ    Contact Us  Your donations are greatly appreciated! Donate

Board index » SEAHAWKS.NET - THE ESSENTIAL SEAHAWKS COMMUNITY » [ THE OFFICIAL NET NATION FAN FORUM ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 30 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
 
Author Message
 Post subject: This ain't your Holmgrens Seahawks
 Post Posted: Thu Oct 11, 2012 12:41 pm 
NET Starter
Offline

Joined: Sun Aug 16, 2009 6:20 am
Posts: 425
One thing I remember when Holmgren was the coach of the Hawks was how few penalties the team was assessed. This year alone we have 3 players that rank in the top 9 in the league (okung 2, giacomini 4, Wilson 9). Pete has got to get this team under control if we are going to make a run. Too many times this year penalties have cost us and if it continues it will eventually cost us the season. A good first step was when he sat Giacomini. This kind of punishment needs to continue to right the ship. Anyone else feel this too?


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: This ain't your Holmgrens Seahawks
 Post Posted: Thu Oct 11, 2012 12:44 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 10:50 am
Posts: 8173
Location: Antioch, CA
There has to be a balance. Holmgren's teams had very few penalties, but along with that came the "soft" label. Because the Seahawks weren't getting in guy's faces and punching them in the mouth.

If guys are being more intimidating physically, then there will be more penalties. It is just unavoidable. But we are past the line of what is acceptable and it needs to be reigned in a bit.

There has to be a balance.

_________________
Image


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: This ain't your Holmgrens Seahawks
 Post Posted: Thu Oct 11, 2012 12:47 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 10:38 am
Posts: 6336
Location: Vancouver, WA
HawkFan72 wrote:
There has to be a balance. Holmgren's teams had very few penalties, but along with that came the "soft" label. Because the Seahawks weren't getting in guy's faces and punching them in the mouth.

If guys are being more intimidating physically, then there will be more penalties. It is just unavoidable. But we are past the line of what is acceptable and it needs to be reigned in a bit.

There has to be a balance.

Good post. Concur 100%.

_________________
Image


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: This ain't your Holmgrens Seahawks
 Post Posted: Thu Oct 11, 2012 12:49 pm 
* Navy Badass *
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 9:23 am
Posts: 16295
Location: Bothell
Also, some of the penalties against Wilson are for things like delay of game - a clear rookie mistake. Those types of penalties will disappear for the most part with experience.

_________________
I blog, I tweet. When I'm not writing or goofing around on Seahawks.NET.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: This ain't your Holmgrens Seahawks
 Post Posted: Thu Oct 11, 2012 12:50 pm 
* Gangnameister *
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Sun Oct 04, 2009 3:29 pm
Posts: 8759
Location: Vancouver BC, Canada
HawkFan72 wrote:
There has to be a balance. Holmgren's teams had very few penalties, but along with that came the "soft" label. Because the Seahawks weren't getting in guy's faces and punching them in the mouth.

If guys are being more intimidating physically, then there will be more penalties. It is just unavoidable. But we are past the line of what is acceptable and it needs to be reigned in a bit.

There has to be a balance.


Absolutely this. To paraphrase an old racing adage; there's a fine line between fast and out of control. To use an old skiing adage; if you don't wipe out now and then, you aren't trying hard enough.

We play a very hard nosed, smash mouth style nowdays so penalties are going to be an unfortunate byproduct of that sometimes as we push the envelope. The key is to keep guys like Breno playing mean and just on the edge of out of control, but within the rules. Because if we let him continue carrying on like he has been, he could easily turn into another Richie Incognito (and that doesn't help anyone).

_________________
My milkshake brings all the turtles to the yard.... damn right... and men's room Drakkar... damn right... and men's room Drakkar.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: This ain't your Holmgrens Seahawks
 Post Posted: Thu Oct 11, 2012 12:53 pm 
* Navy Badass *
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 9:23 am
Posts: 16295
Location: Bothell
Sherman has it figured out. He completely owned Steve Smith, while being smart with penalties and drawing them when Smith reacted to being owned. Sherman needs to teach some of the other guys a thing or two here about doing that and we'll be golden.

_________________
I blog, I tweet. When I'm not writing or goofing around on Seahawks.NET.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: This ain't your Holmgrens Seahawks
 Post Posted: Thu Oct 11, 2012 12:57 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Fri Sep 16, 2011 9:44 am
Posts: 2512
Location: Naples, FL
Holmgren could have never drafted/acquired these players either.

_________________
Wolf grey all day every day.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: This ain't your Holmgrens Seahawks
 Post Posted: Thu Oct 11, 2012 1:02 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2012 10:10 am
Posts: 879
It's definitely a mirror of coaching style and player acquisition.

Holmgren was a rigid discipline fist kind of coach that liked to play more finesse on both sides of the ball, so that's how his team played. Carroll wanted a nasty physical defense, and a nasty physical offensive line. Carroll also runs a loose practice, so we're seeing the result of all these things.

With me, I can forgive the defense picking up a personal foul penalty for being too aggressive, because they've backed it up by being the #1 defense in the league. You can't say the same for the same stupid offensive penalties. This offense is not good enough to overcome personal foul penalties yet.

_________________
If there is no Seahawk football in heaven, then we will never die.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: This ain't your Holmgrens Seahawks
 Post Posted: Thu Oct 11, 2012 1:08 pm 
* 17Power Blogger *
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 8:46 am
Posts: 9705
HawkFan72 wrote:
There has to be a balance. Holmgren's teams had very few penalties, but along with that came the "soft" label.


Nobody was complaining about that in 2005.

_________________
GO HAWKS!!!

Visit my Seahawks blog at 17power.blogspot.com!

Follow me on Twitter at @17power


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: This ain't your Holmgrens Seahawks
 Post Posted: Thu Oct 11, 2012 1:11 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 10:50 am
Posts: 8173
Location: Antioch, CA
MontanaHawk05 wrote:
HawkFan72 wrote:
There has to be a balance. Holmgren's teams had very few penalties, but along with that came the "soft" label.


Nobody was complaining about that in 2005.


Nope, nobody here anyway. But it was said during that season regardless, and we saw the truth in it during the years before and after.

_________________
Image


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: This ain't your Holmgrens Seahawks
 Post Posted: Thu Oct 11, 2012 1:13 pm 
* Navy Badass *
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 9:23 am
Posts: 16295
Location: Bothell
HawkFan72 wrote:
MontanaHawk05 wrote:
HawkFan72 wrote:
There has to be a balance. Holmgren's teams had very few penalties, but along with that came the "soft" label.


Nobody was complaining about that in 2005.


Nope, nobody here anyway. But it was said during that season regardless, and we saw the truth in it during the years before and after.


We may not have been complaining loudly, but it was widely discussed and debated even then. It was a well-deserved label.

_________________
I blog, I tweet. When I'm not writing or goofing around on Seahawks.NET.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: This ain't your Holmgrens Seahawks
 Post Posted: Fri Oct 12, 2012 11:14 am 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 10:52 pm
Posts: 6148
Location: Renton Wa.
We frequently had talked about wanting a more aggressive defense and about having a team that would punch you in the mouth. I remember several threads that came up about how we were perceived as the choir boys of the NFL and that you could kick our ass and we would take it and ask forgiveness on Monday for your soul.

Several times old farts would lament the days of Easley and our defense.

We could have whole multi page threads about Alexander and how he would fall down before contact etc and not show any tough running unless it was a touchdown inside the 10 yard line.

_________________
Image

To Be P/C or Not P/C That is the Question................Seahawks kick Ass !!!!
Used to be an Alumni till they pulled a USC on me...
.Net official Clueless, Dumbass, Douche, Simpleton, CensoredTard , and Idiot.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: This ain't your Holmgrens Seahawks
 Post Posted: Fri Oct 12, 2012 11:24 am 
* The Doc *
* The Doc *
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 7:33 am
Posts: 6594
Location: Covington, Washington
Man I miss Easley. Ha ha ... He said farts.

_________________
Image
"Pray to the LORD now...Seattle are a bunch of heathen atheist Canadians."
NFL GM: "How do you stop a Seahawk? Take away his doctor's prescription pad."”


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: This ain't your Holmgrens Seahawks
 Post Posted: Fri Oct 12, 2012 11:55 am 
* NET Sage *
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Sat May 02, 2009 4:55 pm
Posts: 2670
"Soft" or not, Holmgren got them to a Super Bowl - of which they should have probably won.

I love the attitude of our defense, but the stupid penalties have got to stop.

_________________
Seahawks vs. TBD - Super Bowl 48 - February 2, 2014


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: This ain't your Holmgrens Seahawks
 Post Posted: Fri Oct 12, 2012 11:58 am 
* NET Sage *
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Sat May 02, 2009 4:55 pm
Posts: 2670
VHawk wrote:
Holmgren could have never drafted/acquired these players either.


Probably not.. but in 2005, we were 1st in offense and 7th on defense.

Compare that now to 28th on offense and 2nd on defense.

I'd say Holmgren did ok.

_________________
Seahawks vs. TBD - Super Bowl 48 - February 2, 2014


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: This ain't your Holmgrens Seahawks
 Post Posted: Fri Oct 12, 2012 12:00 pm 
NET Pro Bowler
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 12:38 pm
Posts: 16456
Location: SoCal
Hasselbeck wrote:
VHawk wrote:
Holmgren could have never drafted/acquired these players either.


Probably not.. but in 2005, we were 1st in offense and 7th on defense.

Compare that now to 28th on offense and 2nd on defense.

I'd say Holmgren did ok.


Who cares. That is in the past and we have a young offense, we are improving weekly and who is to say where we will end up this year?


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: This ain't your Holmgrens Seahawks
 Post Posted: Fri Oct 12, 2012 12:06 pm 
NET Rookie
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Sun Sep 13, 2009 12:03 pm
Posts: 235
And one thing that's happening is that the Hawks are picking up the label of "penalty-prone" and it's beginning to stick. The natural result is that refs will look just a little bit closer at whatever the Hawks do. Giacomini has already felt the effects of this and maybe Okung has as well. Once they're looking at you harder than they're looking at the other guy, they WILL find stuff.

_________________
"High fives -- as old school as it is, it's still the best way to celebrate." R. Sherman


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: This ain't your Holmgrens Seahawks
 Post Posted: Fri Oct 12, 2012 12:07 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2007 12:48 am
Posts: 504
Most of Okung's stuff was false starts playing against Arizona where he banged his knee a bit and was trying to over compensate and jumped.... a lot....


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: This ain't your Holmgrens Seahawks
 Post Posted: Fri Oct 12, 2012 12:24 pm 
NET Veteran
Online

Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2010 8:48 pm
Posts: 2095
MontanaHawk05 wrote:
HawkFan72 wrote:
There has to be a balance. Holmgren's teams had very few penalties, but along with that came the "soft" label.


Nobody was complaining about that in 2005.


The Stealers were'nt considered "Soft" they were perceived the better team because they were smashmouth on BOTH sides of the ball, and more than once, they were bestowed the Lombardi because of it
Our Defense is getting a lot fewer penalties than last Year, and now the Offense is sporting a Rook that will get better, and Cable will fine tune the O-line to strike that ballance we need to take us to the next level.
The 49rs Defense kept their Offense in contention, and we will get there when Wilson gets in sync,,,Smith didn't get IT for several years, let's just hope that Wilson finds his groove this Season.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: This ain't your Holmgrens Seahawks
 Post Posted: Fri Oct 12, 2012 12:30 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2012 10:10 am
Posts: 879
VivaEfrenHerrera wrote:
And one thing that's happening is that the Hawks are picking up the label of "penalty-prone" and it's beginning to stick. The natural result is that refs will look just a little bit closer at whatever the Hawks do. Giacomini has already felt the effects of this and maybe Okung has as well. Once they're looking at you harder than they're looking at the other guy, they WILL find stuff.


I'm actually worried about the defensive penalties on Sunday. It's no secret that the league's golden child is Brady, and any hit that's even close to late is going to be called. That goes for holding his precious receivers.

It's gonna be a long day for us if the refs call a bunch of borderline defensive penalties on us that extend drives for the Pats.

_________________
If there is no Seahawk football in heaven, then we will never die.


Top 
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 30 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

Board index » SEAHAWKS.NET - THE ESSENTIAL SEAHAWKS COMMUNITY » [ THE OFFICIAL NET NATION FAN FORUM ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: dbmack, Google [Bot], HawkGANG, lacenterhawk, olyfan63, Omahawk, Spleenhawk2.0 and 81 guests

 
 

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Seahawks.NET is an independent fan site and not associated with the Seattle Seahawks or the NFL (National Football League).
All content within this Seahawks fan page is provided by, and for, Seattle Seahawks fans. Copyright © Seahawks.NET.