The Outfield
New member
- Joined
- Jan 16, 2013
- Messages
- 2,547
- Reaction score
- 0
Hopefully we'll have a blowout victory sometime soon so that we can see this kid play.
The Outfield":238r97qt said:Hopefully we'll have a blowout victory sometime soon so that we can see this kid play.
SalishHawkFan":3mez6i2q said:They felt confident starting the season with 2 QB's. Now they don't feel as confident anymore so they went out and got a third QB. They know more about the state of our olinemens health than we do, but this says something to that imo.
kearly":36bs3ikz said:Lotulelei was one of my least favorite 53 man roster makes of all time. BJ Daniels was one of my favorite late round QB prospects of all time.
This makes me happy.
Tical21":hybbkdfk said:They made this move in an attempt to save money. They think there is a decent chance TJack goes elsewhere either for a shot to start or because at the least he has played himself into a modest raise. This would leave them with one QB. By adding a QB now, you get the chance to teach the guy your system for most of a year, and possibly play himself into an uber cheap backup role next season. Either that, or you're going to have to go out and pay a guy to come be your backup.
lukerguy":2im6zgix said:Do you think there's a chance BJ Daniels could be converted to a different position?
Tical21":10mnzaho said:They made this move in an attempt to save money. They think there is a decent chance TJack goes elsewhere either for a shot to start or because at the least he has played himself into a modest raise. This would leave them with one QB. By adding a QB now, you get the chance to teach the guy your system for most of a year, and possibly play himself into an uber cheap backup role next season. Either that, or you're going to have to go out and pay a guy to come be your backup.
Pandion Haliaetus":2zkzw5x6 said:CALIHAWK1":2zkzw5x6 said:Did we need a third QB? I didn't love the dude but Mike Morgan is a weaker link IMO.
How so?
Morgan is a decent LB, is an even better STer, and is a versatile player who can line-up at any LBer position as well as LEO.
And when he was asked by Quinn over this off-season to put on 15-20 pounds and compete at LEO, Morgan didn't complain, he just put in the hard work.
And yeah you could use an extra QB always if that guy possesses the talent and skillset you want but it could be that Russell Wilson has been taking a lot of damage and might be getting worn out running for his life every game.
SalishHawkFan":xuseqipz said:They felt confident starting the season with 2 QB's. Now they don't feel as confident anymore so they went out and got a third QB. They know more about the state of our olinemens health than we do, but this says something to that imo.
CALIHAWK1":3bof00ck said:Tical21":3bof00ck said:They made this move in an attempt to save money. They think there is a decent chance TJack goes elsewhere either for a shot to start or because at the least he has played himself into a modest raise. This would leave them with one QB. By adding a QB now, you get the chance to teach the guy your system for most of a year, and possibly play himself into an uber cheap backup role next season. Either that, or you're going to have to go out and pay a guy to come be your backup.
You might be right but I think the ship has sailed on T-Jack being a starter and I think he may know that as well. It could save money just because of T-Jacks vet status I suppose.
-The Glove-":pxz3pbh3 said:SalishHawkFan":pxz3pbh3 said:They felt confident starting the season with 2 QB's. Now they don't feel as confident anymore so they went out and got a third QB. They know more about the state of our olinemens health than we do, but this says something to that imo.
I don't think so. I think it was just an opportunity that presented itself. This kid was a guy they were looking to draft, albeit the 7th round, but they still liked him
volsunghawk":umjeo63x said:CALIHAWK1":umjeo63x said:Tical21":umjeo63x said:They made this move in an attempt to save money. They think there is a decent chance TJack goes elsewhere either for a shot to start or because at the least he has played himself into a modest raise. This would leave them with one QB. By adding a QB now, you get the chance to teach the guy your system for most of a year, and possibly play himself into an uber cheap backup role next season. Either that, or you're going to have to go out and pay a guy to come be your backup.
You might be right but I think the ship has sailed on T-Jack being a starter and I think he may know that as well. It could save money just because of T-Jacks vet status I suppose.
Possibly, but you can bet that GMs for QB-needy teams around the league are paying attention to what Tarvaris does in his backup role here. If they think, "He finally matured and can be a caretaker for us for a couple of seasons," then he could get another starting gig shot. You don't think he'd be welcomed in Jacksonville, for example? Maybe the Jags go for their QBOTF in the coming draft and want a reliable backup (i.e., not Gabbert or Henne).
theENGLISHseahawk":h15c55f5 said:I noticed Hawkblogger compared the cutting of Loutlelei to the cutting of Michael Bennett several years ago.
Not even close IMO.
Not sure what the big fuss was about this guy. He looked completely out of his depth in garbage time against the Jaguars. The fact is, he hasn't got close to knocking off the USC backup crew and Benson Mayowa has shown so much more potential as a 'stash for the future' type prospect.
theENGLISHseahawk":1pzvasl4 said:I noticed Hawkblogger compared the cutting of Loutlelei to the cutting of Michael Bennett several years ago.