dunceface
New member
- Joined
- Aug 12, 2011
- Messages
- 3,678
- Reaction score
- 0
ay but Cam looked good in those yogurt commercialsCary Kollins":2ds8nr61 said:shortest dynasty ever?
ay but Cam looked good in those yogurt commercialsCary Kollins":2ds8nr61 said:shortest dynasty ever?
brimsalabim":36het12e said:I think Pete has been exposed a bit. Turns out he is a much better motivator and show man than he is a coach. He can over come this by making good hires and adjusting a few things.
1. How about adding "no friendly fire Friday's" to his cute little list of ra ra's. Too many of our injuries are self inflicted.
Uncle Si":3sffqm6f said:bradynumber4":3sffqm6f said:There's no other way of looking at it. Seahawks threw that game. But in regards to the team breaking up. It could have the opposite affect because they do still have last years win. So that team know's it can win a superbowl. It could be used as extra motivation to get back again and if they were to win it next year, they would still be a dynasty.
i would look no further than the team we gave the game to.
Pats had won 3 Super Bowls in like 4/5 years? then lose 2 heartbreakers. Took some time, but they stayed together and made it back.
Probably shouldnt have won last night, but seeing the Pats sneak away with the Lombardi after losing the last two makes me not that worried about the Seahawks
Uncle Si":2k27hqp7 said:strohmin":2k27hqp7 said:Uncle Si":2k27hqp7 said:bradynumber4":2k27hqp7 said:There's no other way of looking at it. Seahawks threw that game. But in regards to the team breaking up. It could have the opposite affect because they do still have last years win. So that team know's it can win a superbowl. It could be used as extra motivation to get back again and if they were to win it next year, they would still be a dynasty.
i would look no further than the team we gave the game to.
Pats had won 3 Super Bowls in like 4/5 years? then lose 2 heartbreakers. Took some time, but they stayed together and made it back.
Probably shouldnt have won last night, but seeing the Pats sneak away with the Lombardi after losing the last two makes me not that worried about the Seahawks
I don't recall the Patriots losing a super bowl because of their own idiotic plays. What Bevell did may have just destroyed this locker room.
so you think the pros in that locker room, with all the desire and intestinal fortitude it has taken to make it to two straight Super Bowls, after the devastating loss in Atlanta, are suddenly going to turn on themselves?
this teams mantra has always been about getting each others back? its going to stop now?
MVP53":31wsvy6b said:Uncle Si":31wsvy6b said:bradynumber4":31wsvy6b said:There's no other way of looking at it. Seahawks threw that game. But in regards to the team breaking up. It could have the opposite affect because they do still have last years win. So that team know's it can win a superbowl. It could be used as extra motivation to get back again and if they were to win it next year, they would still be a dynasty.
i would look no further than the team we gave the game to.
Pats had won 3 Super Bowls in like 4/5 years? then lose 2 heartbreakers. Took some time, but they stayed together and made it back.
Probably shouldnt have won last night, but seeing the Pats sneak away with the Lombardi after losing the last two makes me not that worried about the Seahawks
Excellent post.
I got a little perspective listening to Cowherd, of all people. He said (paraphrasing), "How good is Seattle? They got outplayed for 3 quarters by GB & NE and still beat GB and came one play from beating NE."
It basically took an incredible performance by maybe the greatest QB of all time to beat the Hawks by 4.
Listen to this man... I know it hurts now but this isn't the beginning of the end... This is the beginning. The team is young and loaded with talent. We'll be backbostonhardo":p6wd6qty said:MVP53":p6wd6qty said:Uncle Si":p6wd6qty said:bradynumber4":p6wd6qty said:There's no other way of looking at it. Seahawks threw that game. But in regards to the team breaking up. It could have the opposite affect because they do still have last years win. So that team know's it can win a superbowl. It could be used as extra motivation to get back again and if they were to win it next year, they would still be a dynasty.
i would look no further than the team we gave the game to.
Pats had won 3 Super Bowls in like 4/5 years? then lose 2 heartbreakers. Took some time, but they stayed together and made it back.
Probably shouldnt have won last night, but seeing the Pats sneak away with the Lombardi after losing the last two makes me not that worried about the Seahawks
Excellent post.
I got a little perspective listening to Cowherd, of all people. He said (paraphrasing), "How good is Seattle? They got outplayed for 3 quarters by GB & NE and still beat GB and came one play from beating NE."
It basically took an incredible performance by maybe the greatest QB of all time to beat the Hawks by 4.
Keep positive. You have a great organization. We know what it feels like to lose by a hair. (See David Tyree). They just need to stick with what got them there.
THIS^Mick063":1502j2q2 said:Bevell has lost the locker room. If he stays, it isn't the beginning of the end. The end has already happened.
These guys won't compete at the level we are accustomed to while knowing a dumbass may destroy a season's worth of hard work in an instant.
scutterhawk":azjwqke1 said:THIS^Mick063":azjwqke1 said:Bevell has lost the locker room. If he stays, it isn't the beginning of the end. The end has already happened.
These guys won't compete at the level we are accustomed to while knowing a dumbass may destroy a season's worth of hard work in an instant.
loafoftatupu":2qu5z9j1 said:The end????
Sure thing. After seeing what I saw this year I am not sure we are even in the middle yet.
strohmin":t4q6loh3 said:Uncle Si":t4q6loh3 said:bradynumber4":t4q6loh3 said:There's no other way of looking at it. Seahawks threw that game. But in regards to the team breaking up. It could have the opposite affect because they do still have last years win. So that team know's it can win a superbowl. It could be used as extra motivation to get back again and if they were to win it next year, they would still be a dynasty.
i would look no further than the team we gave the game to.
Pats had won 3 Super Bowls in like 4/5 years? then lose 2 heartbreakers. Took some time, but they stayed together and made it back.
Probably shouldnt have won last night, but seeing the Pats sneak away with the Lombardi after losing the last two makes me not that worried about the Seahawks
I don't recall the Patriots losing a super bowl because of their own idiotic plays. What Bevell did may have just destroyed this locker room.
DavidSeven":e2jyvwex said:Seems to me that there's a lot of blame to go around. The defense surrendered the go-ahead TD and lost the first 4Q 10-point lead in Super Bowl history. We all know what happened with the offense.
If any of those guys review the tape and can't see that, then there's some maturing they need to do. All this other stuff about losing the locker-room because of one play-caller is people projecting their own feelings onto the situation. I'd like to think Carroll is better at painting the big-picture for his players.