SPARQ Receivers

aawolf

New member
Joined
Apr 28, 2012
Messages
638
Reaction score
0
I'm looking pretty smart with my WR list after round 3 predictions with this SPARQ list--Janis, Hoffman, Campanaro, and maybe Bryant could be in Round 3 if we trade up to get them or maybe round 4.
 

jammerhawk

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 5, 2007
Messages
10,212
Reaction score
1,811
I think this is an important thread given the discussion about WRs that takes place here.

We know the team uses SPARQ as a partial for an initial screening of the players then goes deeper to assess if they are more than workout wonders or have the genuine potential to match their measureables. In the case of most all of our WRs they have high SPARQ scores. In fact the team likes high scores at any position. There's of course a lot more than SPARQ to player assessment and the team doesn't approach the draft like Al Davis but the measureables of players in a consistent formula sorts out a high quality baseline to work with. Character, competitiveness, drivenness, determination to improve one's craft, natural ability, football sense are all also important, but added to a player with a high SPARQ number creates a shorter list to choose from.
 

IBleedBlueAndGreen

New member
Joined
Apr 30, 2009
Messages
2,136
Reaction score
0
Location
Poulsbo, WA
SeahawksFanForever":18f92wjt said:
With the 32 overall pick, Seattle Seahawks select WR Jordan Matthews, Vanderbilt :D

YES. YES. YES. YES. YES. YES. YES. YES. YES. YES. YES. YES. YES. YES. YES. YES. YES. YES. YES. YES. YES. YES. YES.
 

randomation

New member
Joined
Jan 11, 2014
Messages
1,243
Reaction score
0
any chance on 3 cone rankings or just sparq without the bench just curious
 

lukerguy

Active member
Joined
Feb 18, 2012
Messages
2,320
Reaction score
20
I think Sparq is more used for everything but WR and QB. Route running and hands are too important to cosines Sparq too carefully. In a linebacker it's very telling though!
 
Top