Hasselbeck
New member
- Joined
- May 2, 2009
- Messages
- 11,397
- Reaction score
- 4
I just hope Bailey or McCray pan out and make Kam replaceable. We'll see how much he hates his salary then.
No one remembers the good ones apparently.kobebryant":2f3yud7x said:King Dog":2f3yud7x said:kobebryant":2f3yud7x said:northseahawk":2f3yud7x said:trading is not an area of expertise for JS n Pete. They always get fleeced.
Always. The absolutely got "fleeced" getting Marshawn Lynch, Leon Washington, Chris Clemons, getting KJ Wright with the pick acquired for Deion Branch, getting Byron Maxwell with the pick acquired for Lawrence Jackson, getting JR Sweezy and Tharold Simon in the Aaron Curry trade.
:sarcasm_off:
Wow. Those were a while ago. Looks like we're getting worse evaluating trades for sure.
Jury is still out on the Jimmy and Lockett trades.
NorthDallas40oz":wgai2vdn said:Some of you need to get your priorities straight. A future 5th round pick that is likely to be around the #170 selection overall in exchange for a veteran backup at key position (FS) where you have basically nothing behind the starter (who has yet to return to full contact), and for a player who is also an elite ST's coverage guy, is a VERY fair swap. I know everyone wants to believe that future Day 3 draft picks are more important than players who can help a team win a Super Bowl right now while their SB window is open, but the reality is that the vast majority 5th round picks turn into Jimmy Staten and Mark Legree, not Richard Sherman or Kam Chancellor. A future late 5th round pick does absolutely nothing to help the 2015 Seattle Seahawks. Kelcie McCray does.
kearly":25i3vu6d said:Hasselbeck":25i3vu6d said:A FIFTH?! That seems crazy high to me
Such is the hidden price of having a low waiver priority.
It was kind of annoying to give the Lions a 6th round pick for Seisay, a guy that the Lions were very likely to cut. But the Hawks basically had to, because Seattle is 31st on waiver priority. The fact that they offered a 6th strongly hints that someone else offered a 7th. I suspect it was the same thing here for McCray.
I'm not saying that this trade will pan out, but Seattle has a pretty good track record when going through other team's garbage. They used that process to get difference makers like Raheem Brock, Brandon Stokely, O'Brien Schofield, Mike-Rob, Will Tukuafu, Tony Mokeaki, etc. Granted, none of those guys involved losing a pick, but it's basically the same process.
No one remembers the good ones apparently.[/quote]edogg23":fz72co9d said:kobebryant":fz72co9d said:Wow. Those were a while ago. Looks like we're getting worse evaluating trades for sure.
Jury is still out on the Jimmy and Lockett trades.
King Dog":2205jk3z said:I love it though. Should be no problem getting a 3rd for Christine if this guy (who no one has ever heard of) get's a 5th. Sweet!
Oh yeah - and if this guy get's a 5th, we better get a 1st for Kam.
bigwrm":33ascrfa said:Yikes, 5th? Schneider always seems to overpay when trading.
lukerguy":1k9ggj6c said:bigwrm":1k9ggj6c said:Yikes, 5th? Schneider always seems to overpay when trading.
Yeah JS is a horrible GM, right? Give your head a shake.
Remember when he acquired Marshawn Lynch for a 4th round pick?
lukerguy":9k9s4wna said:bigwrm":9k9s4wna said:Yikes, 5th? Schneider always seems to overpay when trading.
Yeah JS is a horrible GM, right? Give your head a shake.
Remember when he acquired Marshawn Lynch for a 4th round pick?