meh it feels like everyone cherry picks this to fit their narrative. Sure in volume stats Denver is low. efficiency stats they’re much higher. I think Russ and Geno are very close in EPA. He’s also made some incredible touchdowns, Game winning drives(as has Geno too) and his EPA actually goes up late in games which could point to a play calling early in games and matches the eye test too. He will never run a conventional offense that is true, and Stidham will do better in this regard. But this is always painted as a massive flaw of Wilson’s by default which is odd. Lamar won’t either but most love his game. Kap didn’t either but he was good enough to get to a SB. Vick didn’t, Cam didn’t, Hurts etc.
You said “‘Most stats that show perfamnce are bottom 6-8 which isn’t true. The ones you’ve decided do that guy that’s subjective and anything that doesn’t fit that narrative is discarded like passer rating, EPA, TD/Int numbers etc. how about points per game? Denver is higher than Seattle.
Again not trying to be snarky and I enjoy your thoughts on this topic but I think we’re all a little guilty of cherry picking stats to support our priors.