Scottemojo
Active member
- Joined
- Apr 30, 2009
- Messages
- 14,663
- Reaction score
- 1
I love that no 49er fans are using gifs of those two plays right now. Moving pictures? Hell nah, they don't frame our case like the still shots.
Jerome Boger. Enough said.Marvin49":3o6gtcyz said:For the record....
I'm upset with the officiating, but it didn't cost the 49ers the game. The game was horribly officiated from top to bottom and bad calls were made both ways.
Gore fumbled. Tavon Austin did NOT step out of bounds (tho that play was replayed anyway on offsetting penatlies).
As for the Crabtree and Kap plays at the end...I disagree. I think it was VERY close. IMO if the ref had called TD on either play they would have stood because the visual evidence wasn't there to overturn.
So...essentially...Niners were up a creek on both calls because there was no visual evidence to overturn once the initial call was made.
Again tho...refs were terrible all day with calls on both teams. No excuse. Niners sucked yesterday. O-Line play in particular was atrocious.
Marvin49":3ncg656u said:45Hawker":3ncg656u said:I didn't think it was a catch - it looked like the tip of the ball touched the ground to help him secure possession. Hard to determine, I admit.FriscosFinest":3ncg656u said:yeah i thought the crabtree catch was a TD.. it definitely broke the plane.. atleast thats how ive always understood it.
BUT, since the refs determined that it was indeed a catch, I think it should have been a TD. When Crabtree made the catch, the ball had broken the plane. 9ers got screwed on that one.
And then the fumble happened. It was inconclusive as to where Kap fumbled. He very well could have been in. What a gut-punch way to lose.
Game should never have been close and calls were bad both ways....but OUCH those two images below make it tough to swallow.
FriscosFinest":1wd30zau said:yeah i thought the crabtree catch was a TD.. it definitely broke the plane.. atleast thats how ive always understood it.
FIFYLargent80":xwb9dkww said:Yes, we all need pictures to make excuses for a LOSS......... :lol:
hoxrox":2aqhdeqp said:The Rams are enjoying their spoiler role this year. Please do us all a favor and beat the Cardinals.
pehawk":ojgqmv7x said:Awesome now our NFL forum is 49ers AND Rams talk. I swear we have more people that are fans of their team than actually love or follow the game.
You want to know who I root for when the Rams and 49ers play? A terrorist attack.
RedAlice":2q2s56d2 said:pehawk":2q2s56d2 said:Awesome now our NFL forum is 49ers AND Rams talk. I swear we have more people that are fans of their team than actually love or follow the game.
You want to know who I root for when the Rams and 49ers play? A terrorist attack.
Actually, now that there is also a competent Cards fan posting here, it's the only board in the NFC W that allows for decent conversation about the NFC W teams and games as a whole. It also has the correct organization for it, and enough intelligent posters to keep constant football conversation about the entire division.
Take that as a huge positive for the board organizers, mods, and posters - it is by far the best run board in the NFC W, if not the league.
pehawk":2m59o29y said:This is like watching my two creepy uncles fight (one of which dates 16yo's...regardless of sex...and the other's a swinger).
Marvin49":2trj9mx0 said:45Hawker":2trj9mx0 said:I didn't think it was a catch - it looked like the tip of the ball touched the ground to help him secure possession. Hard to determine, I admit.FriscosFinest":2trj9mx0 said:yeah i thought the crabtree catch was a TD.. it definitely broke the plane.. atleast thats how ive always understood it.
BUT, since the refs determined that it was indeed a catch, I think it should have been a TD. When Crabtree made the catch, the ball had broken the plane. 9ers got screwed on that one.
And then the fumble happened. It was inconclusive as to where Kap fumbled. He very well could have been in. What a gut-punch way to lose.
Game should never have been close and calls were bad both ways....but OUCH those two images below make it tough to swallow.
hawknation2014":132lnnrc said:Seahawk Sailor":132lnnrc said:[tweet]https://twitter.com/drew_ajeto/status/529104414217617408[/tweet]
Kaepernick also claims he never called Lamarr Houston the N-Word. He is a proven liar.
HansGruber":1zs8jjsb said:Was just in SF for the weekend. It's back to Giants jerseys and nobody caring about the Niners down there. At least they've got a baseball team worth rooting for, I guess.
HawkWow":yox0yoa2 said:Marvin49":yox0yoa2 said:45Hawker":yox0yoa2 said:I didn't think it was a catch - it looked like the tip of the ball touched the ground to help him secure possession. Hard to determine, I admit.FriscosFinest":yox0yoa2 said:yeah i thought the crabtree catch was a TD.. it definitely broke the plane.. atleast thats how ive always understood it.
BUT, since the refs determined that it was indeed a catch, I think it should have been a TD. When Crabtree made the catch, the ball had broken the plane. 9ers got screwed on that one.
And then the fumble happened. It was inconclusive as to where Kap fumbled. He very well could have been in. What a gut-punch way to lose.
Game should never have been close and calls were bad both ways....but OUCH those two images below make it tough to swallow.
Agreed. The NFL has technology that would make NASA blush, but depend on the eyes of an exhausted old guy standing over on the sideline. I could be wrong but I felt Kap regained possession before fumbling again after he was down.
If I'm elected "Inconclusive" will be another way of saying "do-over". Not we have 6 cameras that couldn't determine the outcome of the event, so we are just going with the snap judgment of that guy standing nervously over there fiddling with a rubber band that he depends on to to count from 1 to 4.
The only reason it was called a fumble was because Ram player stood up with ball and it was ruled fumble, review has to have enough to overturn ruling on field which they say it did not. Bottom line is Kap broke the plain of the goal with the ball, should have been ruled a TD. Even if later on the find that call was wrong, Refs will just say "Sorry we made a mistake" typical.
We need professional full time refs.
You guys remember the Patriots game last year where Gronk was held in the endzone 10 feet from the ref, no call, no explanation, game ended, later reviewed and said "sorry we make a mistake", it s BS, the NFL makes enough money to hire full time refs.
And get some goal line cams for crying out loud. Replay is a marvelous tool and should be used to it's fullest, imo. I don't care about "it slows the game down". Slows the game down for who? The networks? The casual observer? Let's get it right and if we can't, let's do it over. Not a perfect answer to the problem, but change is necessary, regardless, imo.
lvnginhwktwn":2euin1cn said:HansGruber":2euin1cn said:Was just in SF for the weekend. It's back to Giants jerseys and nobody caring about the Niners down there. At least they've got a baseball team worth rooting for, I guess.
Pretty sure this has been covered before, the actual city of SF is more of a baseball town, most of the 49er fans have always come from areas outside the the city itself.
HawkWow":e8gmsujf said:Agreed. The NFL has technology that would make NASA blush, but depend on the eyes of an exhausted old guy standing over on the sideline. I could be wrong but I felt Kap regained possession before fumbling again after he was down.
If I'm elected "Inconclusive" will be another way of saying "do-over". Not we have 6 cameras that couldn't determine the outcome of the event, so we are just going with the snap judgment of that guy standing nervously over there fiddling with a rubber band that he depends on to to count from 1 to 4.
And get some goal line cams for crying out loud. Replay is a marvelous tool and should be used to it's fullest, imo. I don't care about "it slows the game down". Slows the game down for who? The networks? The casual observer? Let's get it right and if we can't, let's do it over. Not a perfect answer to the problem, but change is necessary, regardless, imo.