Scottemojo":1zq9l7pm said:Way to sum up what I think. Ultimately, the team quit on Mora. Naysayers said you can't fire a coach after one year, give Mora a chance, and saying the team quit on him was a guaranteed fight, but enough of them did that it was embarrassing to watch. Pete saw it too, the guys he got rid of the next year were pretty much all the go through the motions quitters. Tomsula talks pretty big about all the things the Niners are going to do, as did Mora, but he was part of the staff that had players go through the motions last year as the season wound down, as was Mora, and all the big talk meant nothing. I half expect Tomsula to drop more dirtbags into a rant.kearly":1zq9l7pm said:Scottemojo":1zq9l7pm said:It's a simplistic comparison, but I get a Jim Mora vibe from Tomsula.
I won't be surprised if the Niners eke out 8 wins on Kaepernick's legs, should they actually use them as weapons. I also will not be stunned if they lose 11, or more. The O-line has question marks, the secondary is a bit of a question mark, and they lost a lot of soul this year. Smith, Willis...How do you replace that? Yeah, Harbs was an ass, but how do you replace his in game instincts?
All of those things hurt, but what will truly devastate the 49ers next season will be their inability to run the football. They lost one of the very best run blocking guards in the NFL to FA, and also one of the best run blocking right tackles to retirement. They lost Frank Gore too. And Carlos Hyde has people concerned that he might be injury prone. They lost Harbaugh/Roman and all the creative OL package creativity that helped them dominate in the running game.
This is especially troubling when you consider that Baalke and York have answered almost every press conference question with 'run the ball.'
The insistence on running the ball, despite having precious little ability to do it (outside of Kaepernick), will remind us of the Greg Knapp days. I'm expecting a bottom five offense for SF in 2015.
RE: All the retirements. You get the feeling that the team has quit on Tomsula before his tenure has even begun. I've never seen a team that quit on their coach and could run the football.
How they run scheme is one of the things that has me curious. The Niners are a must watch for me this year just because I am so interested in how they run scheme without Roman/Harbaugh. I know Solari got some credit for what happened there, but the unusual formations, alignments, and tight splits the Niners ran messed with teams that didn't play them often, just like it used to when facing Stanford. And a healthy Iupati is a run blocking force, the guy could pull with a TE and open a lane a truck could drive through. I understand why Marvin wants to drink the koolaid, season tickets feel damn expensive if you are certain your team sucks, but thinking that team got better requires bending logic to hope.
Don't misunderstand me. I'm not saying "They got better". I'm saying it isn't outside the realm of possibility that they could be a better TEAM than they were LAST YEAR. While you may think that's overly hopeful, I'm not making a definitive statement there. I see all the talent leaving the team, but a team is more than just a collection of talent.
In terms of what yer saying about the running game, you could very easily be correct. The problem I see though is that the running game that was so efficient in Harbaugh/Roman first few years really stalled out last year. They had issues along the line with Iupati stuggling coming back from broken ankle, Boone struggling because of the holdout, Davis out a large chunk of the year because of injury (and replaced by Jonathan Martin...a double whammy), and losing both of their centers in the course of the season.
More than all of that though, the unpredictable running scheme that had been so effective was no longer unpredictable. As Roman said many times last year, teams were no longer responding the way they expected them to.
This IMO is one of the reasons they let Harbaugh go....he was married to Roman and never would have moved away from those schemes. Its why they are moving to more of a ZBS and why they hired Chris Foerster as their O-Line coach. I'm not saying here that this will be a huge success or anything, simply explaining why I think they are doing what they are doing.
IF (big if) it works and they can successfully implement the ZBS with a line that still includes Staley, Boone, and Kilgore and add a Brandon Thomas and maybe even an Evan Mathis, then I think Carlos Hyde might thrive in that system.
There are a lot of ifs here. No sugar-coat. Could be a disaster, especially early. I just don't think it's a foregone conclusion.
On defense....jeez....no way around losing Justin. That's a big hole to fill. As for Willis and Borland tho....Willis missed most of the year LAST year. Bowman missed the ENTIRE year. Aldon missed 9 games. With all of the injuries and suspensions, they still mustered the 5th ranked D in the NFL.
Even without Willis and Borland, it looks right now that the LB corps that will start on Monday Night vs the Vikings in week 1 will be better than the one in Dallas week 1 this year.
vs Dallas: Brooks - Willis - Wilhoite - Skuta
vs Minn: Brooks - Wilhoite - Bowman - Smith
The secondary will replace only one player. Culliver.
The D-Line and the DC are the biggest question marks.