FlyHawksFly":1tfnv8jo said:
Ad Hawk":1tfnv8jo said:
But he made the catch; that much is incontrovertible.
The illegal touch wouldn't be called because the review won't allow them to consider it, just as it wouldn't "allow" them to recognize holding on the O-line and call the play back.
Those aren't the same thing though. You can challenge the fact that someone was out of bounds. No different than things like 12 men on the field, or a pass being tipped and it effecting d holding or PI. Many things that are objective penalties can be challenged.
Out of bounds when he caught it, or after he caught it, I could see.
You could certainly be right, I've just never seen it in the game; it would surprise me, though, since it would allow overturn the call based on a penalty, not just ineligibility. Would they assess the penalty, too?