Hypothetical Poll 2005 Team vs 2013 Team

Hypothetical Poll 2005 Team vs 2013 Team

  • 2005

    Votes: 1 5.3%
  • 2013

    Votes: 18 94.7%

  • Total voters
    19

sprhawk73

Active member
Joined
Sep 7, 2017
Messages
492
Reaction score
112
Hypothetically speaking, if the 2005 Seahawks didn't lose to the referees in the Super Bowl, which team would you hold in a higher regard?

I definitely would support the 2005 team because they would have been the first team to win the super bowl and their character was significantly better.
 

Jerhawk

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 22, 2010
Messages
6,247
Reaction score
3,099
Location
Spokane, WA
Hold in higher regard?
Yeah the 2005 team did have a special place in my heart. But they were soft.

The 2013 team was tough and mean. In a head to head game they would wipe the floor with the 2005 team, and then tell them about it afterwards.

The 2005 team was fun to root for because they were a likeable bunch of guys.
The 2013 team was fun to root for because you could count on them to talk smack and back it up
 
OP
OP
sprhawk73

sprhawk73

Active member
Joined
Sep 7, 2017
Messages
492
Reaction score
112
The poll isn't which team would win but which team you would regard. No doubt the 2013 team would win in a head to head, not sure it would be a blow out but the content of character would hinder the 2005 team.

I agree, I think in order to win the super bowl a team has to have players that are willing to bend the rules. You can't win on heart alone these days.

It's weird looking back as a fan knowing that the referees were cheating and how it has affected how I feel about my team.
 

onanygivensunday

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 14, 2010
Messages
5,777
Reaction score
1,727
2013 for me because I hold winners in higher regard compared to losers. Just that simple.
 

Latest posts

Top