hawknation2015
New member
Carroll made a point of saying yesterday that "talent-wise, we’re OK" on the offensive line.
trading or releasing kearse seems to be the best option here...wilson will be on ir by week 2 if this is the o line for the start of the seasonMVP53":3knc6igc said:I'm no cap guy, so maybe I'm reading overthecap.com wrong. But, what we're looking for is guys who have a relatively high cap hit for their production, with relatively low dead money, right?
Just looking I see...
Jermaine Kearse: $2.365M cap vs $0 dead
Mike Morgan: $1M cap vs $150K dead
Christine Michael: $920K cap vs $417 dead
Greg Scruggs: $785K cap vs $100K dead
Anthony McCoy: $745K cap vs $75K dead
None of them are huge cap hits, but they're all pretty much fringe guys to even make the roster, aren't they? Maybe save for Kearse.
Again, I apologize if I'm totally misreading, or completely off my rocker. Analyzing the cap really isn't my thing.
Fade":18nphe53 said:Pandion Haliaetus":18nphe53 said:Lets say 5.5m number is the starting point for Mathis's side. Buts he's already missed half of training camp, is 34 years old, and is likely going to take half the season getting in Sync with everyone from the O-line to the Skill players to the offensive system. Lets assume the Seahawks can talk that price down to 4.5m all guaranteed.
Lets say they offer him a 1.5m guaranteed base + a 3m signing bonus protrated over 3 years, 2015 + 2 faux years.
He essentially costs only $2.5 against the cap but makes $4.5m altogether. Seahawks have to eat $2m over 2016 and 2017 but if they think Mathis will be worth the upgrade and a better fit to protect thier franchise QB then it would be worth it.
This can be done without cutting anyone, money would be tight, and if needed later, theyd probably could ask one of the long-term players to move some base salary into a signing bonus type move to free up cap.
I agree with you entirely, but the Hawks have been extremely conservative when it comes to converting base salaries to signing bonuses. The Seahawks have been the anti Dallas / New Orleans of the world when it comes to kicking the can down the road. There is a middle ground obviously, but it seems Seattle doesn't even want to go there.
Fade":18nphe53 said:Here is a better one. Extend Brandon Mebane 4 years. giving him a $5 million signing bonus with a $1 million base. Saving roughly $3 million against the cap this year. Turn around and sign Evan Mathis to a 1 year deal for $4 million (selling to him he can chase a ring and hit Free Agency the next offseason.)
hawknation2015":26v1x7jv said:jkitsune":26v1x7jv said:hawknation2015":26v1x7jv said:[tweet]https://twitter.com/AdamSchefter/status/634511023270178816[/tweet]
Interesting . . . we don't have anything close to the kind of cap space he is likely looking for. But maybe a one-year "prove it" deal for close to the veteran minimum to win a Super Bowl and stick it to Chip Kelly, parlaying it into a long-term deal somewhere else? Seems unlikely he would turn down more money elsewhere at his age and recent injury history.
Prove what? Evan Mathis is an excellent player, and although the Hawks are a great team, players aren't in the habit of taking far below market value (let alone minimum wage) just to have a one-year chance to win a Super Bowl.
Yup. It doesn't make a lick of sense. But I was enjoying the rumor for a moment.
dumbrabbit":2oa6aop2 said:So, he will follow through his scheduled meeting with the Seahawks, is unlikely to sign a deal with another team before then, and now he'll be playing not for the Seahawks, but for the Chiefs?
jake206":vmhwrs38 said:[tweet]https://twitter.com/Rand_Getling/status/634928754943492096[/tweet]
Welp that ship sailed ...fast :177692:
Glasgow Seahawk":2hhmvflu said:jake206":2hhmvflu said:[tweet]https://twitter.com/Rand_Getling/status/634928754943492096[/tweet]
Welp that ship sailed ...fast :177692:
Fake account apparently
jake206":1351gvll said:Glasgow Seahawk":1351gvll said:jake206":1351gvll said:[tweet]https://twitter.com/Rand_Getling/status/634928754943492096[/tweet]
Welp that ship sailed ...fast :177692:
Fake account apparently
Haven't seen it verified anywhere else so it may indeed be a fake.