keasley45
Well-known member
He plays consistently, so ya don't need hero ball.
That's all I need. I don't need a rabbit pulled out of a hat in cardio-ville EVERY single game.
Geno for Prez!
Was being sarcastic. Agree with you 100%
He plays consistently, so ya don't need hero ball.
That's all I need. I don't need a rabbit pulled out of a hat in cardio-ville EVERY single game.
Geno for Prez!
Don't forget linebacker.Simple. Elegant.
This is the answer.
Not to challenge you, but Spotrac shows us as having just over $46M in 2023 cap space. My uneducated gut tells me this is a closer figure to reality.Seattle has been salary planning as if they would draft their next QB next year and have him on a rookie contract for the next 4 or 5 years..
According to overthecap.com, the Hawks currently have only $30.6M in 2023 cap space. Signing Geno short term will be a challenge.
The $30.6M that otc.com is showing is the Hawks effective cap space, which includes the minimum salaries of currently unsigned players, including their rookie draft class. They list the Hawks having only 33 players under contract for 2023, 18 shy of their standard of 51 players.Not to challenge you, but Spotrac shows us as having just over $46M in 2023 cap space. My uneducated gut tells me this is a closer figure to reality.
THe problem is drafting a quarterback no matter how high, their is no certainty they will be a franchise QB. Look at all the QBs selected with top 3 picks in the last 10 years:I am the first to admit I was wrong so far on Geno but it would take a ton for me to not still grab a franchise guy with a high leverage pick. I hope Geno plays his way into making this a tough decision though.
This post sums it all up.Its going to be an interesting couple of years. Do they draft a qb to compete with Geno?
I would say the answer to that question is related to how they feel about Lock. Do they think lock has the talent to be their starting Qb in the future?
I can see them drafting a QB to compete with lock and eventually Geno, the Qustion is what round? If they use a first round pick you would think they would want him to start after a year or so.. and that would be a vote of no confidence in Lock.
if they use a second or third round pick that would probably be developmental and probably to compete with Lock as Geno does his thing tearing up the league.
Would they Carry 3 QBs? i would think not.. what round they draft a QB says alot IMO.
Just my thoughts
You 100% right but I also trust John in his evaluation of the position. I've been pretty hard on him the past few years because I don't think they've drafted well like most of the board has but I think he knows the position pretty well. He was in on Mahomes and Allen when both weren't slam dunks and had question marks.THe problem is drafting a quarterback no matter how high, their is no certainty they will be a franchise QB. Look at all the QBs selected with top 3 picks in the last 10 years:
Lawence, Z Wilson, Lance, Burrow, Murray, Mayfield, Darnold, Trubisky, Goff, Wentz, Winston, Bortles
How many of these would you class as a franchise back? Possibly Burrow and Murray though neither are classed among the elite in the league. If we let Geno go and traded away both our first rounders and more (say a second) and ended up with Blake Bortles all the talent we manged to get in the 2022 draft would be wasted.
Before the start of the season I was expecting us to get a QB in the 2023 draft and start them immediately. Now the best thing to do is keep Geno, I have no problem with also drafting a QB but as a developmental prospect given time ot learn their trade as a back-up. We can either start him when he is ready (like Mahomes) or, if Geno continues to play lights out, trade him when is stock is high after starting for a few games (Garrapolo)
But that's just it, He hasn't needed to. In the past with RW, every game was a close game. He'd often do very little in the first 3 quarters then turn on the magic in the 4th Quarter. The only real game he had a chance to do such was against ATL and he failed. But against AZ and Chargers he was able to build a 2 score lead and didn't need to. Something that was rare in the past.But he hasnt led a 4th qtr, game winning drive. Until he does that... meh
This is a sharp take as most of the big qb contracts contain a lot of back loaded money. I’m all in on signing Geno to a 2-3 year contract but not beyond.Seattle has been salary planning as if they would draft their next QB next year and have him on a rookie contract for the next 4 or 5 years..
According to overthecap.com, the Hawks currently have only $30.6M in 2023 cap space. Signing Geno short term will be a challenge.
Very difficult to "Break out" while you're sitting on the bench. He was never given the change until Pete gave it to him. For the past eight years everyone wrote him off as a bust, never even looked in his direction. Another gold coin picked from the scrap heap by Mr. Carroll....I also think its way too early to think the Geno we've seen the first 7 weeks is the real Geno over the Geno that never broke out in 10 years. I'm starting to think he is the real deal but its way too early for me to plant my flag. Last game he threw multiple balls that could of been picks. I need to see the 4th quarter stuff too a few times. Russ and all his warts was near league best in high leverage moments and rarely made mistakes.
His last 4 contracts have all been 1 year deals, he may feel that he has done enough to warrant more than another short deal.This is Geno’s prove it year so if he leads us to the playoffs I think we need to revisit his worth. He’ll likely get better offers if he walks. I say extend him short term to an incentive laden deal
No doubt! I’d like to see us grab an Edge, DT, and LB with our first three picks. Doesn’t have to be in that order but…Don't forget linebacker.