Cartire":14q4042v said:
WUnderhill":14q4042v said:
loafoftatupu":14q4042v said:
What is it you expect Panther fans? At 3-2-1 your team had a 6 game losing streak. SIX GAMES.
Just what point are you trying to make? Trying to convince Seahawks fans that they don't know what they are talking about?
12-4 after winning a championship with a target on their back, playing its best football of the season. That is all that is the information needed.
Try again.
The point is that this thread is stupid. The point the thread is trying to make is "Carolina's winning streak doesn't count and Seattle's does because of who Carolina played", but when people point out that Seattle's opponents were unimpressive as well it becomes "Well, their record was different 4 games ago!" and "We went 12-4" and other equally stupid and irrelevant arguments.
Our "unimpressive" opponents actually had a legit winning percentage. Team sport.
Well, since we're judging teams based on what their record was at random points in the season, not on what their ending record was, then I guess it's fair to say the Panthers are an undefeated team. I mean, at one point we were 2-0, and that supports my bias, so that's more relevant than our current record because I say so.
If you're talking about the Cardinals, they are a common opponent and Seattle fans would be the first to tell you that a win against them doesn't count after Carson Palmer went down.
So, looking at ending records, Eagles were the only Seattle opponent with a "legit winning percentage" in your win streak, which apparently makes it SO much better than the Panthers win streak.
I think the lesson here is that you guys just need to get over yourselves. Nobody's saying Seattle is a bad team, we're just saying this whole dismissiveness of the Panthers winning streak is more than a little hypocritical and stupid.