Tech Worlds":1h7wlbim said:HawkerD":1h7wlbim said:Northwest Seahawk":1h7wlbim said:Largent80":1h7wlbim said:Yeah, he had a fantastic whiff on Hardy that allowed him to intercept Russel's pass and if Russ hadn't gotten his ankles, he scores.
Wasn't Bailey playing Left tackle and wasn't the int on the right side, regardless I'll take Bailey over Britt period Britt wiffs 50 percent the time Bailey about ten percent of the plays so to me it's not close. Bailey played better than Okung does most games as well . We fundamentally disagree here .
You're not fundamentally only disagreeing with those on this thread, your are disagreeing with the professional coaching staff of the Seahawks. Yes you have an "opinion" but beware, "opinions" can be wrong. Why in the world would they be starting the current 5 if Bailey is better? They made changes when they thought things weren't necessarily working so they are not afraid to of change. Unless you honestly believe you are a better judge of talent than the staff or you think that the staff is sabotaging the team, your "opinion" doesn't make any sense.
this is flawed logic.
There are instances where a depth player gets a chance to play and once given that chance to play demonstrates is the better player and deserves the playing time.
Richard Sherman is a perfect example.
The idea that there is a perfectly efficient pipeline between talent and playing time is wrong, yes.