Aros":ffrhktfj said:
It was clear and obvious PI that NY chose to ignore to "help" the away team, period. No other explanation is possible.
These are the reasons narratives about the League favoring certain outcomes exist. Giving us the PI call puts the ball on the 1 yard line, 1st and goal with just enough time for the fairy tale finish we all desired and deserved. For whatever reason, the league didn't want that to be the scenario nor outcome.
Oh hell no.
I wasn't gonna wade into this, but I just can't resist this one.
Look, I don't think it was PI because you are asking for the TE to run into a defender, push off and catch the TD on that play and not get an OPI. When the defender instead held his ground and moved in front, you want PI. Either way, you are looking for a OPI to NOT be enforced or a PI to be enforced.
Now I think it was a good non-call, but I can easily state that if I were in your shoes I'd be making similar arguments as to why it was PI. I still think it was PI in the endzone on Crabtree i the SB vs the Ravens. I get it.
THIS is where you lose me. It's the conspiracy theory BS. The "the refs are out to get us" BS. As if the Seahawks weren't holding all night and as if the ONLY REASON the Seahawks even had the ball at that point were because of a ludicrous Personal Foul on the previous 49er drive where the guy was clearly blocking or the PI on Williams that extended a drive on 3rd down.
You wanna say "bad call", ok...whatever...but as soon as you sway into the foil hat "The NFL is trying to help the other team" territory you gone over man.
Don't be that guy.