Nothin, but I would be disappointed. He isn't a down hill type LB. To much chase and tackle, instead of shooting gaps and stuffing the run. He is also a liability in coverage. We need more aggressive LB like Wagz, but that also have plus coverage skills for MM defense. Brooks is nothing similar to Queen & Smith.
Plus, Dissly is a helluva blocker, something that a lot of people overlook in a tight end. Besides, it's not his fault that our offense didn't utilize the tight ends.
I'm not opposed to moving on this year, I'm just curious what Macdonald could drum up with him.... He's easier to move on from next offseason if it doesn't work out, and wouldn't hurt to drum up trade value.
Who Hurtt? Yeah he went to be Philly's DC
. We don't know if Macdonald is running the same scheme is my point. And jamal doesn't need to necessarily be slotted at safety. He can be moved around on down/distance/scheme.Who Hurtt? Yeah he went to be Philly's DC
What do you want MM to get out of Adams? Am I missing something? The dude is done, smoked, damaged goods. He has 51 tackles, 0 sacks, and 0 ints the last 2 seasons? I honestly don't care if we save $10 towards the cap by cutting him. Why would we continue to foster baaaad contracts, especially when we arent getting any production. Like I said he don't fit MM style for a saftey, he is literally polar opposite of Kyle Hamilton. I think we need to draft a rookie to fill his roll. Waaaay cheaper, ND more then likely to be available on Sunday's?
That'd be ideal, not a fan of cutting him but need to get some relief there
I'm fine with (would have preferred) tearing it down, but I think they would have cut geno if that were the case. Why keep him otherwise, he's 34 and has no trade value given the qb market in FA and draft class.
Lockett isn't a 3 and he's 32 this year. But yeah I think 8/yr won't fly, maybe if you mean guaranteed. Wr market is going to be turned on it's head with Jefferson/chase and agents know it. Time to resign dk is imminent (probably next offseason) before they get paid.... Guys like lockett aren't setting for 8/yr regardless of age.
TE wasn't used heavily in Grubb's offense, idk we need to spend millions any further than dissly, can be addressed for vet min/draft, fant/park too expensive
I think there's a decent chance they keep Dissly. Especially with both Fant & Parkinson FA's. Maybe they decide to keep him at a lower number.
I agree about dissly, I'd prefer an extension for some immediate breathing room.
Where do you think theyd get lb's better than Bobby, cheaper since little cap room, without blowing the draft load on it?
Yes sir Lockett is now our #3, JSN was coming on hot towards the end of the year. After Geno figured out JSN is open nearly every play and stopped forcing it to DK & Lockett as much. Like it or not Lockett has lost a step. Besides use your logic, we didn't use the #20 overall pick for a #3 WR. JSN has made Lockett expendable if he won't restructure? Looking @ Valdez Scantling & Tyler Boyd, $10 mil is what Locket is worth. That could save us $17 mil.
We probably have to sign him to a 1yr deal, just outta lack of depth. Bobby unfortunately has lost a step and is a major liability on passing downs in coverage. Matter a fact he is our biggest liability on 3rd down.
Lockett isn't wr 3 until he's #3 in snap counts.
If he could still play 3rd down the same way he wouldn't be available so cheap.
With turning a new page, I would be ok with trading DK and his $24.5 mil. As long as we can get the draft capital to draft for his replacement in the bottom of the 1st top of the 2nd I like
Dissly had 17 targets for 172 yards last season and is scheduled to make $10M this year. Seems like he's being overpaid. PFF graded him at 71.3 which puts him at #15 out of 72. His weakest area was receiving where he was graded at 60.3, not good and certainly not worth $10M.
Definitely overpaid, but his 17 of 22 is a higher % than either Fant or Colby. The kid produces, just needs a reduced cap hit that reflects his utilization (which should be higher).
