WR Jermaine Kearse re-signs with Seahawks 3yrs/13.5m
- Thread starter dontbelikethat
- Start date
titan3131
Active member
- Joined
- Mar 13, 2013
- Messages
- 1,592
- Reaction score
- 0
Well I've decided to become an alcoholic like the night the cards came in our house and we pooped the bed...
Rip my liver
Rip my liver
Rocket
Active member
I already fixed mine - sez "Angry Doug" on it... his first year, when he was sorta our only receiver.HawkAroundTheClock":qk83ppt1 said:
- Joined
- Jan 3, 2013
- Messages
- 11,647
- Reaction score
- 6,495
Good for Kearse but not excited at all about the numbers. Healthy Richardson probably beats him out and you're stuck paying what could be your 5th option in the passing game over 4 million a year. Just seemed like the easiest guy to replace at a much lower cost and use the money elsewhere.
Rocket
Active member
Alcoholism is fun at first... then ya get sick.titan3131":10jvsrr8 said:
vin.couve12
New member
Turned out to be a good guess.HawkMeat":7nvzm6c8 said:
Glasgow Seahawk
Well-known member
- Joined
- Feb 5, 2013
- Messages
- 2,165
- Reaction score
- 721
I'm okay with this but hope it's not at the expense of extending Baldwin. Still hope Richardson can stay health and/or Williams/Smith can step up. Still disappointed Chris Matthews didn't do much after the super bowl.
Erebus
Active member
Mojambo":17pogde2 said:
I agree. The chemistry Kearse and Wilson have together should be worth enough to offset the slightly higher physical upside another WR would bring.
dontbelikethat
New member
- Joined
- Nov 30, 2010
- Messages
- 3,358
- Reaction score
- 0
Ziggyy108":20wzqc2b said:
It's a pretty fair deal imo, especially considering what Marvin Jones, Travis Benjamin and Rishard Matthews got.
Trenchbroom
Active member
Hopefully the lack of interest (which I assume is why he signed with us--lower than he expected) will turn him into Angry Jermaine Kearse and sharpen his game for the next contract.
AJK! AJK!
AJK! AJK!
McGruff
Well-known member
Going off what Rishard Matthew got, I am guessing this is a fairly low bonus payout, high backend contract that amounts to a one or two year deal.
LolaRox":16l0zzbs said:
Isn't that what Mebane got with SD? I would rather have Mebane.
Seattle has plenty of receivers.
Baldwin
Lockett
Richardson
K. Smith
K. Williams
Like someone mentioned using the money to go towards extending Baldwin would've been better.
Is Kearse going to continue to take reps away from Lockett? That irked me all season long. Lockett only saw the field on 3+ receiver sets.
I am so disappointed right now. I wanted Kearse's money to go towards the trenches, whether it be O-Line, or D-Line.
I'm good with it. I'm meh with it. Beats a kick in the...
HawkFan72
Active member
Here's the part of this I don't like, especially after the year Baldwin just had. Baldwin is going to want a bump now.
[tweet]https://twitter.com/hawkblogger/status/708104848416251904[/tweet]
[tweet]https://twitter.com/hawkblogger/status/708104848416251904[/tweet]
McGruff
Well-known member
Fade":fre1rxdl said:
Of that list, without Kearse, Seattle has two proven receivers. Two. Repeat that. Two.
Richardson, Smith and Williams combined have 34 career catches in 4 combined NFL seasons. And Richardson has 30 of those and hasn't really played in a year.
