SantaClaraHawk":33uwodbg said:
HansGruber":33uwodbg said:
More telling is that 83% of the bets on the spread are coming in for Seattle.
Damn.
People putting their money where their mouth is believe Seattle will win the matchup by a pretty drastic margin.
OK, so I don't see how favoring PHI is good for the house at all balance-wise. To restore balance, it would make sense to favor Seattle since the bet would be less "worth" making via spread or moneyline.
As far as favoring PHI because of PHI's desperation, HFA or time-shift, the only one I can truly see is time shift. Even though we have a fairly secure wildcard, we want to not only keep that but get the #1 seed. We're doing better on the road in this regular season.
As far as other reasons, odds are they won't be fixing their extremely thin and not impressive WR crew for this week. Odds are we will have Lockett. So is there something else?
It's not that simple.
Sports books use more than the spread itself to push betting a certain way. They'll adjust payout and other parameters, turn down bets, change the over/under, offer bizarre unique bets, etc.
Again, the sports books don't care about the teams or the games, at all. They don't get into player analysis or anything we're talking about. ALL they care about is balancing the bets. And that's a very complex thing on its own. They don't have time to watch all of the sports they accept wagers on. And AFAIK, all of their analysis is PURELY focused on wager balancing.
And it's not just the number of bets, it's also the value of bets that is being analyzed. 10% of the betting may be going to Philly, but the wagers might be 5x higher in value. Books don't publish that info because if the public sees 2 wagers at $1m each, people might assume the fix is in and then you REALLY see unbalanced betting.
My favorite book is Mandalay Bay. Floyd Mayweather used to place million dollar wagers at the book and it would wack the numbers out. There are stories in Vegas about his team. Rumor has it that he bid a million against himself in a fight simply to drive the books against him and then had his team wager $10m on him. There are a lot of rumors. I've heard that Mandalay has banned him and his team because they were killing the book by planning huge wagers at the last second long after the books can adjust.
A few years ago, there was some fight, I think it was an UFC fight, where like 90% of the betting was coming in one side. The fight went a certain way and the books lost millions. That's a nightmare scenario where casinos don't make much profit on the sports gambling anyway. One bad matchup can make an entire sports book negative for the year.
So it's hard to deduce much from any of the published numbers.
The main point here is that sport books don't give a crap about the game. Their analysis are math nerds who don't even watch sports and don't have the first clue who these teams are. The lines have nothing to do with the game. It is completely based on betting activity and trying to get wagering as even as possible.