Twisted
New member
- Joined
- Oct 31, 2010
- Messages
- 1,552
- Reaction score
- 0
so I am going to say it now that I have the chance, the Falcons are NOT an elite squad!
C'mon MAN
C'mon MAN
Giants finished 9-7. Why are you spouting incorrect information ALL OVER this forum and the official Atlanta Falcons one this week? Dude, this is like the 5th time I've busted your BS this week. What gives? You need to stop.Twisted":1gvczvqt said:fact of the matter is the Falcons haven't played a team that finished over .500 since week 5 (skins)
C'MON MAN!
RolandDeschain":3byv1w1z said:Giants finished 9-7. Why are you spouting incorrect information ALL OVER this forum and the official Atlanta Falcons one this week? Dude, this is like the 5th time I've busted your BS this week. What gives? You need to stop.Twisted":3byv1w1z said:fact of the matter is the Falcons haven't played a team that finished over .500 since week 5 (skins)
C'MON MAN!
I'm pretty sure there was an implied "if" -- as in: If we lose, this will be why.sc85sis":ki6o4q66 said:It's certainly possible that pass rush could hurt us and we could lose. It's also possible it won't. I think the only real issue I have with Rob's post is that his headline says he thinks the Hawks "will" lose--not "could" lose.
We held on to wear out a Defense that was playing good ball. We settled in and made the right adjustments.gdawg":1n0mvw8h said:you guys held on to beat a one legged quarterback, don't get it twisted, they'll be some down and out hawks fans on here sunday evening, but you guys had a great season, you can always build on that, just not this year.
pehawk":pnn8h9a2 said:I have to think, if pressuring the QB was a priority for Pete and Gus, they'd blitz more. We wonder why they don't blitz? Its fairly obvious why, in their scheme and philosiphy, pressuring the QB isn't paramount.
That's the only way to rationalize how they succed w/o consistent pressure AND rarely blitz. Its very odd and unique to them, but, that's what it is.
I know that's simplistic in a forum/thread featuring complexities. But, this is a lot easier to understand than "why don't they blitz?" and "how are they #1 w/o pressure?". IMO, we're missing a big part of their gameplan, and it shows why none of us are on a NFL staff.
gdawg":1d2ezwcx said:you guys held on to beat a one legged quarterback, don't get it twisted, they'll be some down and out hawks fans on here sunday evening, but you guys had a great season, you can always build on that, just not this year.
sc85sis":1or9hri5 said:It's certainly possible that pass rush could hurt us and we could lose. It's also possible it won't. I think the only real issue I have with Rob's post is that his headline says he thinks the Hawks "will" lose--not "could" lose.
gdawg":2dyn0o0n said:you guys held on to beat a one legged quarterback, don't get it twisted, they'll be some down and out hawks fans on here sunday evening, but you guys had a great season, you can always build on that, just not this year.
Greenhell":lf84sak8 said:gdawg":lf84sak8 said:you guys held on to beat a one legged quarterback, don't get it twisted, they'll be some down and out hawks fans on here sunday evening, but you guys had a great season, you can always build on that, just not this year.
Whether he was one legged or not, he doesn't play defense. 24 unanswered points. 'nuff said.