Subzero717
Active member
Rawls, Michael, another UDFA
Thats not realistic in any situation IMO. Lynch is due 11 I believe. I doubt hes on our roster next year and it wont be as a back up.Overseasfan":1yeux96x said:Best case scenario would be #1 Rawls with Lynch as primary back up but I'm not sure how realistic that is with Marshawn's big cap hit.
Not only will they not pay Lynch $12m next year, i doubt they would bring him back for even half that.iigakusei":1irbyslh said:Does anyone really think the team will pay Lynch $12 million for next year? I personally think there is 0% change of that.
What would be the point in bringing him back with fewer touches, making him one of the most overpaid RBs in the NFL?fridayfrenzy":26t7dc8m said:Lynch will be back. I think he will love having more RBs to take touches while getting paid during this time.
I don't see why Lynch would bother signing the contract extension if he wasn't interested in playing.
rideaducati":1b7jfw33 said:If Michael puts the work in over the offseason, I think he might be the starting RB next year.
austinslater25":sfnheyo9 said:I've been a constant Michael cheerleader on .net but there isn't much chance of him or anyone beating out Rawls next year. He was just too good.
I also think there is almost zero chance the Seahawks pay Lynch 12 million dollars next year so he's gone unless he takes a huge paycut.
2016 is Rawls/Elliott and Michael.