olyfan63
Well-known member
- Joined
- Apr 17, 2012
- Messages
- 6,168
- Reaction score
- 2,276
First, delighted that the Huskies won. However, it seems like an array of game choices by the Huskies gave Texas more opportunities than they deserved, to the brink of nearly pulling defeat from the jaws of victory. Sure, the injury to RB Dillon Johnson resulted from a flawed coaching decision, but "mostly" was just horrible luck and a flawed rule. The fair catch interference penalty resulting from hustle and effort with a misjudgment. So more "breaks of the game", schitt-for-luck, than "coaching decisions", IMO.
The coaching decisions...
One turning point was the lack of urgency to score a TD on the first FG drive of the 2nd half, where the drive ended with Run-Run-Run. The Huskies run game hadn't been effective other than a change of pace. Sure, a pass is no guarantee of a score either, but better odds of a score with at least one pass, instead of three runs, IMO.
I thought the bigger turning point was when the Huskies used up only 1:30 on that possession with 12:39 minutes left, with the Huskies up by 13. A great deep ball yielded only 15 yards, not 50, due to a "professional foul" PI, then the Huskies went 3-and-out, including a failed flea-flicker play. On at least one of the plays, it looked like Penix had some room to run and just threw the ball away. After the punt, Texas still had 11+ minutes left, and with that pounding running game that opened up play action passing, and plenty of time for Texas to keep running the ball. While I applaud the Huskies' OC go-for-the-jugular mindset, moving the ball down the field with high percentage passes would have bled off more time and maybe wound up with a score, and less opportunity for Texas to get back in the game. It was kinda weird though... it seemed Penix suddenly was channeling Russell Wilson and becoming risk-averse to throws he'd been making successfully earlier in the game, playing "tight" as some called it. Or was that Texas D adjustments? In any case, Texas took the punt and marched right down for a TD to suddenly make it a one-score game with lots of time left.
How do others see it? What could/should the Huskies' coaching staff, or Penix, have done differently to keep Texas down with the Huskies' jaws firmly around the Longhorns throat? Am I just being picky because the Huskies have won nail-biters all year, and this is just what they do, somebody always makes a big play at the end? (Which is a great formula until it isn't) Will this type of "tight" play backfire against an (arguably) more talented Michigan team?
P.S. Anyone else think the refs could have easily called PI on Elijah Jackson on that final play, as Jackson seemed to have his arm on Mitchell's shoulder, keeping him from jumping very high?
The coaching decisions...
One turning point was the lack of urgency to score a TD on the first FG drive of the 2nd half, where the drive ended with Run-Run-Run. The Huskies run game hadn't been effective other than a change of pace. Sure, a pass is no guarantee of a score either, but better odds of a score with at least one pass, instead of three runs, IMO.
I thought the bigger turning point was when the Huskies used up only 1:30 on that possession with 12:39 minutes left, with the Huskies up by 13. A great deep ball yielded only 15 yards, not 50, due to a "professional foul" PI, then the Huskies went 3-and-out, including a failed flea-flicker play. On at least one of the plays, it looked like Penix had some room to run and just threw the ball away. After the punt, Texas still had 11+ minutes left, and with that pounding running game that opened up play action passing, and plenty of time for Texas to keep running the ball. While I applaud the Huskies' OC go-for-the-jugular mindset, moving the ball down the field with high percentage passes would have bled off more time and maybe wound up with a score, and less opportunity for Texas to get back in the game. It was kinda weird though... it seemed Penix suddenly was channeling Russell Wilson and becoming risk-averse to throws he'd been making successfully earlier in the game, playing "tight" as some called it. Or was that Texas D adjustments? In any case, Texas took the punt and marched right down for a TD to suddenly make it a one-score game with lots of time left.
How do others see it? What could/should the Huskies' coaching staff, or Penix, have done differently to keep Texas down with the Huskies' jaws firmly around the Longhorns throat? Am I just being picky because the Huskies have won nail-biters all year, and this is just what they do, somebody always makes a big play at the end? (Which is a great formula until it isn't) Will this type of "tight" play backfire against an (arguably) more talented Michigan team?
P.S. Anyone else think the refs could have easily called PI on Elijah Jackson on that final play, as Jackson seemed to have his arm on Mitchell's shoulder, keeping him from jumping very high?
Last edited: