Super Bowl Mathematical Model

[hawks85]

well I was browsing nfl.com and came across this SB mathematical model. according to this we have the same chance of reaching the SB as the redskins. I know its just those bums at nfl.com saying what they want, but it stings a little you know. I think were better than the redskins.

 

[Overseasfan]

Having to go through 3 games is always harder than 2. Then take into account thatbeating the Vikes and Panthers is much harder than beating the Packers and Cards.

 

[johnnyfever]

Not to mention all road games.

 

[Natethegreat]

Having to go through 3 games is always harder than 2. Then take into account thatbeating the Vikes and Panthers is much harder than beating the Packers and Cards.

I was thinking this too then i remembered they have three games too. With only one at home. Seahawks have a tough road though so I can see why.

 

[HawkGA]

Having to go through 3 games is always harder than 2. Then take into account thatbeating the Vikes and Panthers is much harder than beating the Packers and Cards.

In addition to the Packers and Cards, the Redskins would have to get through the Seahawks. That right there should drop their percentage to zero!

 

[hawks85]

Having to go through 3 games is always harder than 2. Then take into account thatbeating the Vikes and Panthers is much harder than beating the Packers and Cards.

agreed but I still think vikes and panthers are overrated. the only thing they got going fo them is there home field. i'm not saying were going to blow any one out but they will not none of those teams will blow us out road game or not.

 

[Crizilla]

wutz math?

 

[seahawks08]

Guys we went till Atlanta and lost in the last few seconds when we made a run on the road. We were new, we were not tried and tested. How do you compare that to now, I am confident without being cocky. Of all the teams remaining I know Seattle is built and coached to win.

 

[Seahawks1983]

Having to go through 3 games is always harder than 2. Then take into account thatbeating the Vikes and Panthers is much harder than beating the Packers and Cards.

I was thinking this too then i remembered they have three games too. With only one at home. Seahawks have a tough road though so I can see why.

Technically the Redskins could have 2 home games, they would host the NFCCG if the opponent is the Seahawks.

 

[Seahawk Sailor]

Having to go through 3 games is always harder than 2. Then take into account thatbeating the Vikes and Panthers is much harder than beating the Packers and Cards.

I was thinking this too then i remembered they have three games too. With only one at home. Seahawks have a tough road though so I can see why.

Technically the Redskins could have 2 home games, they would host the NFCCG if the opponent is the Seahawks.

And based on seedings and the current spread against the Vikings, they'd be severe underdogs too, meaning someone's mathematics is off.

 

[loafoftatupu]

This year the Hawks have held 4th quarter leads or beaten every team in the NFC playoff field they have played this year. Wilson has been getting the better of all those teams since his Rookie season.

Since the 2nd half of the 2012 season the Hawks have been good on the road and their 2 playoff loses with Wilson were the ridiculous.

Other than having to win 3 games, I see nothing to sway their chances.

 

[Anonymous]

Here's the link to the page being discussed.

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap300000 ... er-bowl-50

While they do have the Texans as dead last, they also have the Bengals as the top rated team. And as we all well know, Cincinnati got bounced out last night. So who knows what's going to happen this year. Although the last two years it was accurate as to who made it to the Super Bowl...you have to go back to 2012 to see where it wasn't the two top ranked teams.