glenwo2
Well-known member
- Joined
- Mar 12, 2025
- Messages
- 631
- Reaction score
- 640
If I'm the father of that prankster, this is what I would do :

If I'm the father of that prankster, this is what I would do :
![]()
True but this seems, to me, a way to protect the "NFL is racist" narrative that Sanders and company are running here to explain away exactly why Sanders dropped like stone in the Draft.Lot of stupid people commenting in that thread. So many saying there's no point in the Giants releasing the footage; hell yes, there is. You'd have to be stupid not to see it. Releasing that footage would further reinforce, on top of the big slide he took in the draft, that your ego better ****ing be in check when it comes time to enter the NFL to all the kids in college, high school, junior high, etc.
The NFL is racist lost all credibility when the queen of sports race baiting Jamele Hill said it wasn’t about raceTrue but this seems, to me, a way to protect the "NFL is racist" narrative that Sanders and company are running here to explain away exactly why Sanders dropped like stone in the Draft.
If this vid was released, it would show how arrogant and stupid he was. (though I wonder how race-baiters like Stephen A Smith would spin THAT sh*t)
He probably said some stupid sh*t about other teams and other players, thus putting a target on his back whenever he gets on the field.
Never thought I'd see the day when there would be someone worse than Colin KaeperDICK....At least Colin had some talent at one point....
Eh.The NFL is racist lost all credibility when the queen of sports race baiting Jamele Hill said it wasn’t about race
Eh.Eh.
The NFL is comprised almost entirely of black players making tons of money.
So the "NFL is racist" thing rings hollow.
But yeah...I remember Jamele Hill. blech.
Release it because we all want to see it.To be clear, I'm not automatically saying it should be released, I can't gauge that unless I see it; but anybody thinking there's no point in doing so is naive.
Racism exists in the NFL. I don't know what else to say. Whether it plays out in bias, implicit or explicit, or just run of the mill societal generalizations. I'm sure that white-hood style racism isn't a part of the NFL anymore, but that's not the only kind.The only terrible take is the take you posted (ie The NFL is racist)
But to each his own.
Mahommes, Young, Williams, Daniels, Lamar, Geno, Murray, Wilson, Fields, Stroud, Love, Penix, Dak, Ward, and maybe Tua. That looks like an almost 50/50 split for black and white QBs. Coaches and GMs are definitely a minority though, but that seems to be changing too.Racism exists in the NFL. I don't know what else to say. Whether it plays out in bias, implicit or explicit, or just run of the mill societal generalizations. I'm sure that white-hood style racism isn't a part of the NFL anymore, but that's not the only kind.
The NFL isn't inherently racist and I'm not even saying that racism is the primary or significant role in Shedeur's experience. He genuinely could have been an unprepared, dismissive moron. He might not be an NFL level QB. Like, there's explanations that don't include him being a loudmouth negro. But there are explanations that include that. We may never know for sure, but dismissing racism because black players exist is stupid. Black players are the majority yet black QBs, black coaches, black GMs are not.
The percentage isn’t as much as you think in 2023 it was 54% black but I get what you are saying. The number of black players in the NBA was surprising I thought it was over 90% while the number for the 2023-2024 season was 70.4%Eh.
The NFL is comprised almost entirely of black players making tons of money.
So the "NFL is racist" thing rings hollow.
But yeah...I remember Jamele Hill. blech.
That’s a cool jerseyNow that Derek Carr has decided to retire, there's speculation that the Saints might trade for one of the 5 QB's that the Browns currently have under their control.
Speaking of the Browns, has there been a team that has been more dysfunctional at the quarterback position?
View attachment 71471