hawksfansince90
Active member
- Joined
- Jan 26, 2014
- Messages
- 269
- Reaction score
- 70
He has practically no play calling experience. Another lap dog and "yes man" for Pete.
HawkRiderFan":bbv5uetm said:One of the problems with the 2020 offense, was there were times when RW wasn't allowed to change the play. Per Jake Heaps, the Giants game was one where Russell had to go with the plays he was given. I think that's going to change.
This reminds me of a quote from Russ after that awful 4th and 1 play in that game that didn't come close to working. Russ said that "they didn't get the look they were expecting". I just threw my arms up reading that thinking whey didn't he change the play or just take the 5 yard delay of game and punt it.
sdog1981":2fmhn1jl said:Chawker":2fmhn1jl said:The advantages of running a two back set are as follows:
1. A lead blocker on run plays
2. A extra pass blocker in a max protection or blitzing situation.
3. A extra check down receiver.
4. Can free up a TE from his block duties.
5. Lens more creedents to the play action pass.
A two back set is crucial to the success of any NFL team.
In 1995
Name one successful team since the 90s that ran a two-back offense? Even the 2013 Seahawks had a fullback on the field for 8 plays in the SB.
hawksfansince90":1ioh78sy said:He has practically no play calling experience. Another lap dog and "yes man" for Pete.
Seanhawk":vz6is9vy said:sdog1981":vz6is9vy said:Chawker":vz6is9vy said:The advantages of running a two back set are as follows:
1. A lead blocker on run plays
2. A extra pass blocker in a max protection or blitzing situation.
3. A extra check down receiver.
4. Can free up a TE from his block duties.
5. Lens more creedents to the play action pass.
A two back set is crucial to the success of any NFL team.
In 1995
Name one successful team since the 90s that ran a two-back offense? Even the 2013 Seahawks had a fullback on the field for 8 plays in the SB.
Not saying I agree with him, but um, the 2005 Seahawks.
Maelstrom787":3a9rnzy0 said:hawksfansince90":3a9rnzy0 said:He has practically no play calling experience. Another lap dog and "yes man" for Pete.
This is what I mean when I say that folks are gonna stick to whatever narrative they've heard, come hell or high water.
Sgt. Largent":1xo7pptv said:Maelstrom787":1xo7pptv said:hawksfansince90":1xo7pptv said:He has practically no play calling experience. Another lap dog and "yes man" for Pete.
This is what I mean when I say that folks are gonna stick to whatever narrative they've heard, come hell or high water.
Well homey here has been a hawks fan since 90, so he probably knows what he's talking about.
I can almost guarantee that Waldron was a Russell approved hire, because you know damn well Pete and Russell met post season and Russell expressed his concern with the stagnated and predictable offense.
So IMO the Waldron hire IS Pete being proactive about trying to get a little more innovation into his offensive schemes, and Waldron comes from the Belichick/Shanahan and McVay tree, which is EXACTLY that, dynamic innovative run and short passing game.
Great fit for me. Obviously experience is an issue, but he's been in those meeting rooms for almost a decade, so I'm honestly not worried about the experience part. Seems like a very sharp coach.
chris98251":29s95gpa said:Sgt. Largent":29s95gpa said:Maelstrom787":29s95gpa said:hawksfansince90":29s95gpa said:He has practically no play calling experience. Another lap dog and "yes man" for Pete.
This is what I mean when I say that folks are gonna stick to whatever narrative they've heard, come hell or high water.
Well homey here has been a hawks fan since 90, so he probably knows what he's talking about.
I can almost guarantee that Waldron was a Russell approved hire, because you know damn well Pete and Russell met post season and Russell expressed his concern with the stagnated and predictable offense.
So IMO the Waldron hire IS Pete being proactive about trying to get a little more innovation into his offensive schemes, and Waldron comes from the Belichick/Shanahan and McVay tree, which is EXACTLY that, dynamic innovative run and short passing game.
Great fit for me. Obviously experience is an issue, but he's been in those meeting rooms for almost a decade, so I'm honestly not worried about the experience part. Seems like a very sharp coach.
Wilson asking to be included tells me he was a CC on the email not the To, Wilson will approve or say he approves anyone we bring in because he is not counter Culture and does Corporate speak as well as CEO's, he hated seeing Schotty go, at least he actually stated that.
I really wish they would go back and look at the Bills under Levy, the K Gun would be a perfect offense for us, using Thomas and Reed as will as a host of other receivers and TE's Kelly moved that offens e up and down the field.
They used Shot gun a lot and spread the field. Look at Indy under Reich, they have a lot of it's elements also, why they could turn things around quickly there with Rivers even who came from a different type of offense with the Chargers.
Aros":38zzcsky said:Make no mistake about it. This has Wilson's hand prints all over it. It shows Pete is willing to be flexible with the offense and trusts Russ' input enough to allow his thoughts and concerns to shape the hire itself. I love it.
sdog1981":3qfx3og4 said:Seanhawk":3qfx3og4 said:sdog1981":3qfx3og4 said:Chawker":3qfx3og4 said:The advantages of running a two back set are as follows:
1. A lead blocker on run plays
2. A extra pass blocker in a max protection or blitzing situation.
3. A extra check down receiver.
4. Can free up a TE from his block duties.
5. Lens more creedents to the play action pass.
A two back set is crucial to the success of any NFL team.
In 1995
Name one successful team since the 90s that ran a two-back offense? Even the 2013 Seahawks had a fullback on the field for 8 plays in the SB.
Not saying I agree with him, but um, the 2005 Seahawks.
2005 is much closer to the 90s than 2021.
As for the 49ers, Juszcyk is on the field for 40% of the snaps. That includes the team running 57% of their snaps from 1 back sets. New England ran the most 2 back sets last season with 37% of their snaps.
Hell to the Yeah..^^^^ THIS ^^^^Maelstrom787":18iox4e9 said:hawksfansince90":18iox4e9 said:He has practically no play calling experience. Another lap dog and "yes man" for Pete.
This is what I mean when I say that folks are gonna stick to whatever narrative they've heard, come hell or high water.
HEAR HERE!!, My sentiments exactly...Hell, when DK Metcalf said that "Teams Defenses were figuring us out", tells you all you need to know about the crappy timing, and play-calls not being called in in a timely manner.Aros":3f7bta11 said:Make no mistake about it. This has Wilson's hand prints all over it. It shows Pete is willing to be flexible with the offense and trusts Russ' input enough to allow his thoughts and concerns to shape the hire itself. I love it.