- Joined
- Nov 29, 2015
- Messages
- 7,232
- Reaction score
- 5,983
If imma bitch about Seattles defense it would be, them forcing ways to get adams in there.
The defense imo is better without Adams.
The defense imo is better without Adams.
Yet you still respond. You do infact argue with air.I don’t argue with air
Never seen this many hormones in one thread, whewSays the guy whose responding to me with meaningless stats.
Oh dont worry, we have people in here providing stats that this defense is improving amd looking just fine and dandy.So disappointed. I thought Pete might've learned with how things played out in the first 4 games.
When they sat in soft zone they were the worst defense in the league. When they went with pressure based looks they had success and are one of the best defenses in the league.
Not today...I would just like to see a Cincinnati drive that does not end in a TD. That'd help my psyche.
That includes youNever seen this many hormones in one thread, whew
They didn’t on that driveI'm not kidding, Cincy will score a TD on every drive today...
Yeah that is very surprisingThey are explicitly working on Woolen. Almost every pass is going to the guy he's covering.
So.....you were kidding?I'm not kidding, Cincy will score a TD on every drive today...
I was hoping to jinx myself, I love crow!They didn’t on that drive
Woolen is holding his own IMO...They are explicitly working on Woolen. Almost every pass is going to the guy he's covering.
I'm not kidding, Cincy will score a TD on every drive today...
I was being melodramatic. I love to be wrong about my pessimism...So.....you were kidding?