94Smith
Well-known member
- Joined
- Sep 4, 2018
- Messages
- 1,596
- Reaction score
- 1,001
Raiders defense is playing horrible. Blown coverages all over the field
rlkats":1eksid5x said:Popeyejones":1eksid5x said:Nice start for Mullens but it's fools gold. Head getting high % easy throws to wide receivers getting schemed open against a horrid defended.
I agree Popeye. 9era fans don’t get over excited.
Maulbert":1gza9s4d said:rlkats":1gza9s4d said:Popeyejones":1gza9s4d said:Nice start for Mullens but it's fools gold. Head getting high % easy throws to wide receivers getting schemed open against a horrid defended.
I agree Popeye. 9era fans don’t get over excited.
Even if that's true, do you guarantee Beathard would have done as well? I've gotta believe Mullens has at least played himself into the starting job for now.
Popeyejones":3588xouf said:Maulbert":3588xouf said:rlkats":3588xouf said:Popeyejones":3588xouf said:Nice start for Mullens but it's fools gold. Head getting high % easy throws to wide receivers getting schemed open against a horrid defended.
I agree Popeye. 9era fans don’t get over excited.
Even if that's true, do you guarantee Beathard would have done as well? I've gotta believe Mullens has at least played himself into the starting job for now.
Oh yeah, I think he's secured at minimum another start.
That doesn't make him good though.
One of the niners beat reporters tweeted out that he's got some Shaun Hill in him, and I think that's a pretty brilliant comp.
rlkats":hz8v61u0 said:Popeyejones":hz8v61u0 said:Maulbert":hz8v61u0 said:rlkats":hz8v61u0 said:I agree Popeye. 9era fans don’t get over excited.
Even if that's true, do you guarantee Beathard would have done as well? I've gotta believe Mullens has at least played himself into the starting job for now.
Oh yeah, I think he's secured at minimum another start.
That doesn't make him good though.
One of the niners beat reporters tweeted out that he's got some Shaun Hill in him, and I think that's a pretty brilliant comp.
I’m in the same opinion as Popeye.
sdog1981":9zxbwamm said:7 sacks Tom Cable is the worst. Marsh was 2.5 sacks in one game? We all said to hold off on signing Clark after the Raiders game.
Maulbert":k40fb551 said:sdog1981":k40fb551 said:7 sacks Tom Cable is the worst. Marsh was 2.5 sacks in one game? We all said to hold off on signing Clark after the Raiders game.
Seriously, no matter what the Raiders are paying him, he should be arrested for theft.
Smellyman":3t15thj2 said:Remember it's college football coaches that are not teaching them right. It's not his fault!
Ramfan128":2knjbccu said:Wow. If the Niners could beat the Cardinals they'd be 4-5 right now..
Ramfan128":1setnlyd said:Wow. If the Niners could beat the Cardinals they'd be 4-5 right now..
94Smith":394y9r02 said:I'm not saying Mullens is going to be any better than CJ at this point. Yeah he was releasing the ball quickly and without hesitation, but some of those catches were blown WIDE open. The Raiders did not look like they were trying. The reads were quick because they were easy. And, if he stays in, he is not going to face a tough defense until 12-02 against the Seahawks as the next two teams are the Giants and the Bucs. Pump the brakes on Mullens, the Raiders did not seem they were trying.