blaisio
Active member
- Joined
- Dec 7, 2011
- Messages
- 137
- Reaction score
- 66
So I have been reading a lot on here about concerns on the defense, which is always a concern considering Pete is a defensive coach.
So my question is basically on Pete's position roles from years past. Has he changed how he incorporates those roles?
I recall hearing a lot on Pete's use of defense positions differently than other coaches. So for example, using Red Bryant as a DE to fill up space and defend the run. Bringing in pass rush DE on passing downs. Using Clemons or Bruce as the Leo on the left side. Huge DT like Mebane and Branch to clog the middle and get push but maintain their space.
Having Earl as FS to be the eraser, have a lb basically as a SS to cover TE and defend the run.
And corners to stay to a specific side.
Obviously we were talking about pro bowlers and hof players, but I haven't really seen the philosophy be as prominent.
It feels like our defense is more of the same as others in the league, just not as good. Feels more like we are looking more into versatility at positions rather than keeping a player at one spot. One thing Pete did really well early on was looking for attributes that fit his system while using other players to make up for their weakness. Allowing us to pick up the Kams, Sherman, moving Red to be successful at DE, Bruce as Leo, getting guys that could maximize their strengths.
Im no defense expert, but have we gone away from this philosophy?
So my question is basically on Pete's position roles from years past. Has he changed how he incorporates those roles?
I recall hearing a lot on Pete's use of defense positions differently than other coaches. So for example, using Red Bryant as a DE to fill up space and defend the run. Bringing in pass rush DE on passing downs. Using Clemons or Bruce as the Leo on the left side. Huge DT like Mebane and Branch to clog the middle and get push but maintain their space.
Having Earl as FS to be the eraser, have a lb basically as a SS to cover TE and defend the run.
And corners to stay to a specific side.
Obviously we were talking about pro bowlers and hof players, but I haven't really seen the philosophy be as prominent.
It feels like our defense is more of the same as others in the league, just not as good. Feels more like we are looking more into versatility at positions rather than keeping a player at one spot. One thing Pete did really well early on was looking for attributes that fit his system while using other players to make up for their weakness. Allowing us to pick up the Kams, Sherman, moving Red to be successful at DE, Bruce as Leo, getting guys that could maximize their strengths.
Im no defense expert, but have we gone away from this philosophy?