Chukarhawk
Well-known member
- Joined
- Sep 23, 2011
- Messages
- 5,088
- Reaction score
- 2,773
That would suck but this defense sure has not looked great as of late.
You have a point, but Oregon State beat Stanford 62-17. That's what good teams do to mediocre opponents. Washington beat Stanford in a much closer game, 42-33.I would not say UW just "barely" beat those teams. Washington led by 9 for most the second half against Stanford. ASU was closer but an 8 point win isn't barely winning in my book, and there was certainly nothing lucky about either of those victories.
If there was any luck, it was with Utah and USC. Washington dropping a pick six before the end zone. USC blocking a punt and barely tipping a perfectly thrown pass with their 6'6 linebacker with massively long arms, which would have been an easy TD that turned into an INT. Even then, Washington best USC by 10, more than Oregon did, and Washington did it on the road.
However, I don't really subscribe to the idea of luck when it comes to plays like that. They were good plays made by the other team.
The officiating was pretty bad in some of these games, too. Against Utah, Odunze got mugged repeatedly. Killed drives not calling it, too. Same thing against ASU.... Blatant pass interference not called. Oh well, though. Gotta beat the officials.
Supposedly, many of Washingtons players had the flu when they played ASU and Stanford. That's the word on the street. I don't know much about it though.
Just my opinion.
He tried but that rain was pouring and the WR's were dropping perfectEven though Washington got the W, I would have liked to see Penix pound those Beavers harder!
View attachment 61930
Not elevate?They beat a tough ranked team on the road in horribleA lot lower scoring game than I expected, almost certainly due to the weather. Since this CFB playoff system is still basically a beauty contest, the game isn't likely to elevate the Huskies chances of getting a berth. They'll have to hope that one of the four teams ahead of them loses.