Predictions at #90?

hieroglyphics

Active member
Joined
Jan 26, 2014
Messages
368
Reaction score
56
Center Graham Glasgow is my prediction.

Apparently he held his own against our newest Seahawk, Jarran Reed in the Senior bowl, he really impressed against him.

If the organization loves Reed enough to trade up for him, perhaps they also would go for the guy who impressed up against Reed at the Center spot.
 

sutz

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 1, 2007
Messages
30,705
Reaction score
7,248
Location
Kent, WA
I like the way you think. IMHO, we still need some work on the interior line (assuming Ifedi is a tackle).
 

JSeahawks

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 1, 2007
Messages
24,104
Reaction score
43
Location
Milwaukie, Oregon
Max tuerck is another option.

I'd actually like to package a couple if those 3's to move up for shon Coleman.
 

McGruff

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 2, 2007
Messages
5,424
Reaction score
174
Location
Tri-Cities, WA
Anything goes from this point out.

Safety with Green and Simmons is still possible.

Interior line with McGovern or Thuny or Dahl.

TE with Vannett or Jerell Adams
 

chris98251

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 27, 2007
Messages
40,592
Reaction score
2,925
Location
Roy Wa.
JSeahawks":2kdgw4zx said:
Max tuerck is another option.

I'd actually like to package a couple if those 3's to move up for shon Coleman.

Put the Madden Controller down J :)
 

RobDaHawk

Active member
Joined
Aug 23, 2011
Messages
786
Reaction score
110
Location
Kent, WA
As long as we don't take a kicker I'll be okay with it. I'm gonna guess another O lineman
 

McGruff

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 2, 2007
Messages
5,424
Reaction score
174
Location
Tri-Cities, WA
Actually, I can see having NO PICKS between 97 and 171 driving John nuts, and I think we're going to trade down to get some more middle round picks.
 

Hasselbeck

New member
Joined
May 2, 2009
Messages
11,397
Reaction score
4
McGruff":zf22xyd8 said:
Actually, I can see having NO PICKS between 97 and 171 driving John nuts, and I think we're going to trade down to get some more middle round picks.

Definitely also an option. Especially with 3 3rd rounders
 

sutz

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 1, 2007
Messages
30,705
Reaction score
7,248
Location
Kent, WA
Hasselbeck":zj7cpcjx said:
McGruff":zj7cpcjx said:
Actually, I can see having NO PICKS between 97 and 171 driving John nuts, and I think we're going to trade down to get some more middle round picks.

Definitely also an option. Especially with 3 3rd rounders
Yeah, if we get good value with one of those 3's, I could see trading at least one of them for some 4's/5's.
 

HawkGA

New member
Joined
May 1, 2009
Messages
107,412
Reaction score
1
Already have 10 picks. I don't see the Hawks trading down.

Er, I guess we're back to 9 with the trade up.
 

sutz

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 1, 2007
Messages
30,705
Reaction score
7,248
Location
Kent, WA
HawkGA":23wwo7ru said:
Already have 10 picks. I don't see the Hawks trading down.

Er, I guess we're back to 9 with the trade up.
Good point, but they could use one of the 3's (packaged with a 4-7 or two) to trade up and the other to trade down. That would basically balance out.
 

sc85sis

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 13, 2010
Messages
8,606
Reaction score
1,473
Location
Houston Suburbs
I've wondered about Tuerk. He's played almost every spot on the line and is athletic. Biggest question is the knee injury.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

HawkGA

New member
Joined
May 1, 2009
Messages
107,412
Reaction score
1
That's true. But I sure like the idea of 3 3's rather than 2 3's and extra 5 or whatever it would be.
 

sutz

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 1, 2007
Messages
30,705
Reaction score
7,248
Location
Kent, WA
HawkGA":3sri26cf said:
That's true. But I sure like the idea of 3 3's rather than 2 3's and extra 5 or whatever it would be.
Yeah, depends on who's available and if they need to trade up to get someone high on their board. Lot of flexibility available to J & S, including just standing pat, like you're saying.
 

cover-2

New member
Joined
Nov 4, 2011
Messages
867
Reaction score
0
I'm guessing TE Nick Vannett. The selection of Vannett continunes the Seahawks trend of drafting big tough players. Vannett would be our best blocking TE from Day 1.

CEH141122056_Indiana_at_OSU.jpg
 

Latest posts

Top