Pick #45, 2nd Round: WR Paul Richardson, Colorado

Joined
Aug 4, 2011
Messages
952
Reaction score
15
Wanted Robinson from Penn state but im a Penn state homer. Robinson is a Boldin clone and is a playmaker. However I am a sucker for speed. Im just glad they are addressing some of our needs.
 
OP
OP
Seahawk Sailor

Seahawk Sailor

Active member
Joined
Mar 3, 2007
Messages
22,963
Reaction score
1
Location
California via Negros Occidental, Philippines
We keep talking about the drops, but on the other hand, we say he's played with horrible quarterback play all college, and has done exceptional in spite of it. I wonder how many of those drops were really bad throws that he just couldn't snag. He seemed pretty adept at snagging wild throws in the highlights reels.
 

TwistedHusky

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 8, 2013
Messages
7,109
Reaction score
1,279
You don't fill immediate holes at WR in the draft.

It very rarely happens, so it is pointless to talk about.

It won't matter how great or poor his game tape looks, WRs are a bad investment as a high draft pick because they don't contribute for, on average, 1-2 years.

So this is hopefully a KR/PR position fill.

Given that, it probably doesn't matter who we drafted at WR - it just likely means that the 2nd round pick won't matter much for the next year to year and half. I suppose you could throw Kearse at me if you wanted, as an example of a WR that produced fairly early but the average WR takes several years to start producing so I wouldn't get excited.

Maybe I am steamed that the 49ers look to have vaulted past us given they filled holes in the secondary (one weakness) and then got one of the better FA WRs in the NFL adding to their weapons. I would have preferred we traded this 2nd for him but what is done is done.

Either way, even if JS again made a genius move and plucked a diamond in the rough - this guy still isn't going to contribute much this year if at all because WRs don't (in general) start to come on until year 2 or after.

So this was a pick that didn't hurt us but won't help us and we needed the help. Then again, we did already win the SB so I cannot complain much. But this won't make it easier to get back there this year, this is more an investment in the future if he pans out (hopefully).
 

Shadowhawk

New member
Joined
Mar 3, 2007
Messages
1,513
Reaction score
0
razgriz737":dfefmr5q said:
The more I hear about this guy the more I like the pick! I have gone from "huh?" to being ecstatic.

That seems to be the hallmark of most PC/JS draft picks.
 

joeseahawks

New member
Joined
Dec 2, 2012
Messages
2,248
Reaction score
0
Location
NC
Speed, Speed, Speed ... wow ...
Now we need to give RW time to throw the rock to these speedsters
 

Seahaaaawks

New member
Joined
Jan 19, 2014
Messages
1,641
Reaction score
0
Location
Medford Oregon
This kid looks like a stud! As much as I hated seeing Tate go, from the videos I've seen he seems like a good replacement. Good luck defenses!!!
 

seatownlowdown

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 19, 2013
Messages
1,433
Reaction score
2,221
Location
seatown
TwistedHusky":253uc6vp said:
You don't fill immediate holes at WR in the draft.

It very rarely happens, so it is pointless to talk about.

It won't matter how great or poor his game tape looks, WRs are a bad investment as a high draft pick because they don't contribute for, on average, 1-2 years.

So this is hopefully a KR/PR position fill.

Given that, it probably doesn't matter who we drafted at WR - it just likely means that the 2nd round pick won't matter much for the next year to year and half. I suppose you could throw Kearse at me if you wanted, as an example of a WR that produced fairly early but the average WR takes several years to start producing so I wouldn't get excited.

Maybe I am steamed that the 49ers look to have vaulted past us given they filled holes in the secondary (one weakness) and then got one of the better FA WRs in the NFL adding to their weapons. I would have preferred we traded this 2nd for him but what is done is done.

Either way, even if JS again made a genius move and plucked a diamond in the rough - this guy still isn't going to contribute much this year if at all because WRs don't (in general) start to come on until year 2 or after.

So this was a pick that didn't hurt us but won't help us and we needed the help.

first of all, eff the 9ers. we knew the ammunition they had going into this draft. no need to talk about them.

and i understand how u and some of the other .netters feel about some of these decisions. but u have to look deeper than just surface level, which is what kiper/mcshay etc usually dont do. they still havent figured out how the hawks do things, have they? these guys give britt a 5th round grade, but do they know if someone was in line to take him if we didnt at #64? do they know what we are looking for in lineman? who cares.

u cant worry about what talking heads are saying or what other teams are doing. we have our own program here. i didnt enjoy the hawks trading down. but guess what, they got 2 extra 4ths doing so. and realizing what we've built this team with (mid-late round draft picks and unique talents), i have to say the draft so far fits right into what JS and PC are/have been doing for years now.

as far as recievers taking 2+ years to develop... not necessarily. depends on the players and the program. so far we have done well with recievers that have bought in to the program. when mike williams was committed to keeping slim, he even did well here. adb and kearse have even shown what udfa's can do, which is create an immediate impact for this team.

despite winning 1 superb owl, pc and js are still building this thing. patience bros, patience.
 

General Manager

New member
Joined
Oct 11, 2011
Messages
2,260
Reaction score
0
They keep drafting for speed at WR there going to hit on one at some point hopefully it's Richardson. He has that game breaking speed that a defense has to account for.
 

BlueTalon

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 3, 2007
Messages
9,218
Reaction score
2,045
Location
Eastern Washington
TwistedHusky":dcp9vytp said:
Maybe I am steamed that the 49ers look to have vaulted past us given they filled holes in the secondary (one weakness) and then got one of the better FA WRs in the NFL adding to their weapons.
Don't worry about it. The digits have a poor history recently of getting their new guys on the field.
 

Donn2390

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 17, 2012
Messages
1,105
Reaction score
895
Location
Riverside, California
After reading all of the negative comments on how terrible the first two picks were, I realize there is no hope at all.
I suggest we just disband the team and sell the stadium for a housing development, it's the only we will be able to make these keyboard experts happy..
 

kearly

New member
Joined
Mar 6, 2007
Messages
15,974
Reaction score
0
Snohomie":3tlhqvxk said:
Richardson gives me really strong Mike Wallace vibes.

Good comp. Will be an even better comp after Richardson puts some weight on. Given Seattle's insistence on quality run blocking and need for WR durability, significant weight gain is a guarantee for Richardson. (According to Richardson himself, the guy played at 161 pounds last season. Wow.)

I've always thought Wilson was basically bizarro Big Ben, very different and yet so similar. Bevell's reliance on the big play is a lot like what Arians did with Big Ben and Mike Wallace a few years ago, so in that sense going for a guy like Richardson makes a lot of sense.

I like the Wallace comp because Wallace is a wonderful WR if you pass deep all the time. On deep throws he is one of the very best in the business, but seems pedestrian in pretty much any other situation. Watching Richardson I see a guy that is a pain to defend deep but is otherwise fairly ordinary. The physique and appearance similarities are pretty striking, both guys even share similar arm tatoos.
 

LickMyNuts

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 29, 2013
Messages
987
Reaction score
368
His shoe laces are a 1/4 inch too short and his mom makes bad chicken soup. Terrible choice.
 

DavidSeven

New member
Joined
Jan 18, 2013
Messages
5,742
Reaction score
0
His reel looks a lot better than Jordan Matthews and Allen Robinson's IMO. I didn't pay much attention to Richardson since he wasn't a "name," but I really wasn't sold on those other guys. They looked ordinary to me. Matthews, in particular, looked like he was benefiting hugely from gimmicky volume offense designed to get him open looks (probably a good fit for Chip Kelly, but not as much for anyone else). Richardson appears to have had similar production to Matthews while catching deeply thrown ducks. I did like Davante Adams, who Green Bay took at #53.
 
OP
OP
Seahawk Sailor

Seahawk Sailor

Active member
Joined
Mar 3, 2007
Messages
22,963
Reaction score
1
Location
California via Negros Occidental, Philippines
No matter what you think of the pick, you gotta admit, Pete and John nailed it in terms of when they felt they could pick him. They wanted him at #32, and successfully traded down TWICE, nabbing an extra pair of picks, before getting the same guy they would have taken in the 1st round. That's some brash talent, there!

Aaron Levine ‏@AaronQ13Fox 37m
John Schneider says Paul Richardson was the name they had ready to take last night before trading down. #q13fox #Seahawks

Also, we kind of know this already, but I think it's important to note:

Terry Blount ‏@TerryBlountESPN 35m
Schneider on Richardson: "He really just carried their offense [at Colorado]."
 

3Rivershawk

New member
Joined
Feb 4, 2014
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I would imagine that with proper NFL level nutrition and weight training to add bulk without losing speed, Richardson will have all the tools to be an excellent weapon. You cannot teach speed or the innate ability to be elusive, which he appears to have in spades.

As always, it comes down to the individual player being willing to put in the commitment to be the best. I for one think this was an excellent pick, and look forward to seeing what the kid can do.
 

-The Glove-

New member
Joined
Jan 20, 2011
Messages
7,689
Reaction score
0
TwistedHusky":h0c31bur said:
You don't fill immediate holes at WR in the draft.

It very rarely happens, so it is pointless to talk about.

It won't matter how great or poor his game tape looks, WRs are a bad investment as a high draft pick because they don't contribute for, on average, 1-2 years.

So this is hopefully a KR/PR position fill.

Given that, it probably doesn't matter who we drafted at WR - it just likely means that the 2nd round pick won't matter much for the next year to year and half. I suppose you could throw Kearse at me if you wanted, as an example of a WR that produced fairly early but the average WR takes several years to start producing so I wouldn't get excited.

Maybe I am steamed that the 49ers look to have vaulted past us given they filled holes in the secondary (one weakness) and then got one of the better FA WRs in the NFL adding to their weapons. I would have preferred we traded this 2nd for him but what is done is done.

Either way, even if JS again made a genius move and plucked a diamond in the rough - this guy still isn't going to contribute much this year if at all because WRs don't (in general) start to come on until year 2 or after.

So this was a pick that didn't hurt us but won't help us and we needed the help. Then again, we did already win the SB so I cannot complain much. But this won't make it easier to get back there this year, this is more an investment in the future if he pans out (hopefully).

Always the voice of reason
 

Latest posts

Top