Pete Rose died.

JPatera76

Administrator
Administrator
Moderator
Joined
Nov 29, 2015
Messages
7,661
Reaction score
6,627
I get it, he gambled on baseball while he was in the league as a manager.
It’s against the rules absolutely but it didn’t have any impact on what he did as a player on the field.
He still holds multiple records.

I don’t think it was ever proven that he manipulated the put a game, I believe he deserves the HOF, and I’d certainly vote to allow him in.


YMMV
Same 100%
 

IndyHawk

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 19, 2013
Messages
8,982
Reaction score
2,639
I find it ironic that a lot in sports wouldn't say shit about him or stand up while he was alive... but now he's passed its "RIP, Such a legend" etc etc
MLB sounded hypocritical putting a real long sorry this and that:
But THEY banned him for way too long, I'm sure he'd tell them to
go stick it where the sun doesn't shine.
RIP Charlie Hustle!
 

Flyingsquad23

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 5, 2016
Messages
1,566
Reaction score
725
RIP
Great ball player… narcissistic unrepentant gambling addict that sullied his own name.
His skill was HOF worthy his actions deservingly kept him out. But now his bust will be enshrined.
 
OP
OP
pmedic920

pmedic920

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Jul 12, 2013
Messages
30,235
Reaction score
5,947
Location
On the lake, Livingston Texas
RIP
Great ball player… narcissistic unrepentant gambling addict that sullied his own name.
His skill was HOF worthy his actions deservingly kept him out. But now his bust will be enshrined.
Harsh take IMO.

I’ll have to assume you’re nearly perfect and have no skeletons in your closet.

Good for you, very few Humans can’t stand out like that.
 

Flyingsquad23

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 5, 2016
Messages
1,566
Reaction score
725
Harsh take IMO.

I’ll have to assume you’re nearly perfect and have no skeletons in your closet.

Good for you, very few Humans can’t stand out like that.
Classic response, I never eluded to me being perfect, but I’m also not the one that’s been pissing and moaning for decades about not being in the hall of fame…after a sports gambling scandal.

He got the punishment he earned and now he will get the enshrinement he earned.
 

RiverDog

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 8, 2013
Messages
6,175
Reaction score
3,908
Location
Kennewick, WA
Pete Rose was one of my first baseball favorites. I saw him hit a home run off Warren Spahn, the first MLB home run I had ever witnessed in person when I was 10 years old. He was incredible, not physically gifted like so many athletes, but rather succeeded more on pure guts and determination than on his raw talent. His signature was his headfirst slide.

But I do not support his induction into the HOF, at least not without a number of changes. Not gambling on baseball is one of the oldest rules in the game, and it was put there for a reason: The game itself was nearly destroyed after a gambling scandal in 1919, ie the Black Sox Scandal, which resulted in a number of players receiving permanent bans, including a HOF worthy Shoeless Joe Jackson.

In the World Series that resulted in Shoeless Joe's receiving a lifetime ban, he had 19 hits, 1 home run, 8 RBI's, and hit .375, accounting for 11 of the White Sox 20 runs, yet he received a lifetime ban for supposedly throwing the Series. Admit him first and I'll be OK with admitting Rose.

There are other HOF quality players with more compelling arguments for induction than Pete Rose. Barry Bonds, Roger Clemmons, Sammy Sosa, and Mark McGuire, even though they never broke any established rules and are eligible for the HOF, have been blackballed for their use of steroids.

I don't have a lot of sympathy for Pete Rose. He knew the rules and the consequences. They're actually posted in every MLB dugout. He lied about it in the investigation until he was confronted with undeniable evidence. Sorry, man, there's more people out there with better sob stories than Pete Rose.
 
Last edited:

NoGain

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 28, 2022
Messages
3,161
Reaction score
3,302
Rose might have been a more sympathetic figure if he didn't deny the allegations against him for so long, showed more contrition, and just admitted he had a problem. He just kept digging a bigger hole for himself.
 

Sperrydogg

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 1, 2023
Messages
2,917
Reaction score
1,851
Location
Port Angeles Washington in the mountains
Rose might have been a more sympathetic figure if he didn't deny the allegations against him for so long, was more contrite, and just admitted he had a problem.
Yeah probably, but it’s so weird to be mad at him gambling when he won so much you could tell he wasn’t sand bagging to win bets. He was just gambling and having fun
 

onanygivensunday

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 14, 2010
Messages
6,285
Reaction score
2,404
Yeah probably, but it’s so weird to be mad at him gambling when he won so much you could tell he wasn’t sand bagging to win bets. He was just gambling and having fun
IIRC, he never bet against his team... always for.

Keeping him out of the Hall while he was alive was justified... but now that he's passed, he belongs in the HoF.

My rationale... He knew his play justified being in the Hall, but his punishment was not letting him experience the glory/satisfaction/knowledge of being enshrined, which is now moot.
 

IndyHawk

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 19, 2013
Messages
8,982
Reaction score
2,639
Pete Rose was one of my first baseball favorites. I saw him hit a home run off Warren Spahn, the first MLB home run I had ever witnessed in person when I was 10 years old. He was incredible, not physically gifted like so many athletes, but rather succeeded more on pure guts and determination than on his raw talent. His signature was his headfirst slide.

But I do not support his induction into the HOF, at least not without a number of changes. Not gambling on baseball is one of the oldest rules in the game, and it was put there for a reason: The game itself was nearly destroyed after a gambling scandal in 1919, ie the Black Sox Scandal, which resulted in a number of players receiving permanent bans, including a HOF worthy Shoeless Joe Jackson.

In the World Series that resulted in Shoeless Joe's receiving a lifetime ban, he had 19 hits, 1 home run, 8 RBI's, and hit .375, accounting for 11 of the White Sox 20 runs, yet he received a lifetime ban for supposedly throwing the Series. Admit him first and I'll be OK with admitting Rose.

There are other HOF quality players with more compelling arguments for induction than Pete Rose. Barry Bonds, Roger Clemmons, Sammy Sosa, and Mark McGuire, even though they never broke any established rules and are eligible for the HOF, have been blackballed for their use of steroids.

I don't have a lot of sympathy for Pete Rose. He knew the rules and the consequences. They're actually posted in every MLB dugout. He lied about it in the investigation until he was confronted with undeniable evidence. Sorry, man, there's more people out there with better sob stories than Pete Rose.
i think Joe got screwed, he couldn't read or write and they had him sign a confession.
His numbers do not support being in any part of it clearly.
 

RiverDog

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 8, 2013
Messages
6,175
Reaction score
3,908
Location
Kennewick, WA
i think Joe got screwed, he couldn't read or write and they had him sign a confession.
His numbers do not support being in any part of it clearly.
Yep, absolutely. How in the heck could you hit as well as he did in that series when you're supposed to be playing to lose? Shoeless Joe's exclusion from the HOF is a far greater injustice than Pete Rose, who had undeniable evidence lodged against him.
 

Latest posts

Top