Atradees
Well-known member
Boom is back. I could see the turnovers increasing again, Nice.
BuZzB28":3qme2wpx said:Bronwer will be replacing to Kam? If Kam is still injured? Then he should bench because he was play too well! :roll:
Basis4day":1izfdfnm said:BuZzB28":1izfdfnm said:Bronwer will be replacing to Kam? If Kam is still injured? Then he should bench because he was play too well! :roll:
No, Browner isn't replacing Kam as the starting SS. They are discussing Browner's position should he make the final 53 man roster.
That's interesting.seedhawk":1n9rx8df said:I think we may perhaps be looking at this upside down. If you look at the bandit package photo, then, imagine it the same, with 3 down guys, Wagner for Tatupu, KJ for Lewis, move Kam up to Milloys spot, and sub Browner in behind for Kam.
An Avril, Bennet, Clark whatever should still generate pressure. Wags and KJ fill the holes. Kam busts/jams the TE, then hands him off to Browner who proceeds to mug the dude. Kam then looks to destroy anyone going short. Our other 4 DB guys just do their job. Situationaly, should work very well.
kearly":39nyridb said:Seattle has generally avoided having specialist DBs in the past so this news is a pleasant surprise for me. Good call by Scotte, he predicted Browner would be a TE matchup guy.
If this holds true I like the Browner signing a lot more. Browner's size and speed compares pretty well to Kam.
I wonder if this means Seattle is getting back to the "big nickle" 3 safety defense like the one they had in 2010 and 2011. Given the current personnel, it would make a lot of sense.
Dude, you've totally blown my mind. I spent most of the evening thinking about this. Are they planning on only rushing 3? That opens you up for a bunch of different coverages. You can even put Browner in a man on the TE and still play your base cover-3.seedhawk":2ps8sfo6 said:I think we may perhaps be looking at this upside down. If you look at the bandit package photo, then, imagine it the same, with 3 down guys, Wagner for Tatupu, KJ for Lewis, move Kam up to Milloys spot, and sub Browner in behind for Kam.
An Avril, Bennet, Clark whatever should still generate pressure. Wags and KJ fill the holes. Kam busts/jams the TE, then hands him off to Browner who proceeds to mug the dude. Kam then looks to destroy anyone going short. Our other 4 DB guys just do their job. Situationaly, should work very well.
edogg23":gdqh0t76 said:Not to highjack this into a Bandit defense thread, but I don't understand why Pete completely dropped the concept when it worked pretty well for him early here. One of the advantages teams have when they play the seahawks is that they pretty much know exactly what they are going to get from our D. Why not switch it up and bring back some 7 db sets where they are all wandering around the line and you have no idea where pressure is going to come from.
chris98251":3hdrnjrl said:Linebackers got healthy
Basis4day":3tzkc2va said:BuZzB28":3tzkc2va said:Bronwer will be replacing to Kam? If Kam is still injured? Then he should bench because he was play too well! :roll:
No, Browner isn't replacing Kam as the starting SS. They are discussing Browner's position should he make the final 53 man roster.