MRob has physical with Seahawks tomorrow (confirmed by team)

Status
Not open for further replies.

Hawkscanner

New member
Joined
Jan 17, 2011
Messages
2,145
Reaction score
0
Location
Middle of Nowhere, Washington
kearly":3i1p9snu said:
They are probably testing him for whatever bug he had before, so I'm assuming it's not a routine physical and might require extra time.

Another thought on why we may not have heard anything is in regards to the contract. If he's passed, it could be contract negotiations that are holding things up. I'm totally speculating, but that's completely plausible given the circumstances.
 

ImTheScientist

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 2, 2012
Messages
3,726
Reaction score
64
kearly":3edvs0ud said:
They are probably testing him for whatever bug he had before, so I'm assuming it's not a routine physical and might require extra time.

Not a bug, it was meds.

Sooooooo out of the loop.
 

Exittium

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 27, 2012
Messages
3,081
Reaction score
57
I'm happy to hear this news more for the fact since we released M.Rob our run game IMO to me has looked like its taken a significant hit. M.Rob's become like the Ying to Lynch's Yang and's become apparent especially when half the time you can sense lynch doesn't trust our rookie Fb's running opposite of them or avoiding them all together.
 

Basis4day

Active member
Joined
Aug 15, 2011
Messages
5,924
Reaction score
0
Exittium":10i0cu2w said:
I'm happy to hear this news more for the fact since we released M.Rob our run game IMO to me has looked like its taken a significant hit. M.Rob's become like the Ying to Lynch's Yang and's become apparent especially when half the time you can sense lynch doesn't trust our rookie Fb's running opposite of them or avoiding them all together.

Whether it's true or not, i don't recall hearing this sentiment until Kearly (pretty sure it was Kip) wrote it. Now i see it all over the board. Same phrasing "trust".
 

Scottemojo

Active member
Joined
Apr 30, 2009
Messages
14,663
Reaction score
1
Basis4day":21t7qyhx said:
Exittium":21t7qyhx said:
I'm happy to hear this news more for the fact since we released M.Rob our run game IMO to me has looked like its taken a significant hit. M.Rob's become like the Ying to Lynch's Yang and's become apparent especially when half the time you can sense lynch doesn't trust our rookie Fb's running opposite of them or avoiding them all together.

Whether it's true or not, i don't recall hearing this sentiment until Kearly (pretty sure it was Kip) wrote it. Now i see it all over the board. Same phrasing "trust".

Are you accusing the board of groupthink? Letting Kip think for them?
 

ImTheScientist

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 2, 2012
Messages
3,726
Reaction score
64
Basis4day":3gy4p36w said:
Exittium":3gy4p36w said:
I'm happy to hear this news more for the fact since we released M.Rob our run game IMO to me has looked like its taken a significant hit. M.Rob's become like the Ying to Lynch's Yang and's become apparent especially when half the time you can sense lynch doesn't trust our rookie Fb's running opposite of them or avoiding them all together.

Whether it's true or not, i don't recall hearing this sentiment until Kearly (pretty sure it was Kip) wrote it. Now i see it all over the board. Same phrasing "trust".

I myself wonder how the kip fan club will function or think without his posts.
 

Scottemojo

Active member
Joined
Apr 30, 2009
Messages
14,663
Reaction score
1
T-Sizzle":3i0oj0ur said:
Basis4day":3i0oj0ur said:
Exittium":3i0oj0ur said:
I'm happy to hear this news more for the fact since we released M.Rob our run game IMO to me has looked like its taken a significant hit. M.Rob's become like the Ying to Lynch's Yang and's become apparent especially when half the time you can sense lynch doesn't trust our rookie Fb's running opposite of them or avoiding them all together.

Whether it's true or not, i don't recall hearing this sentiment until Kearly (pretty sure it was Kip) wrote it. Now i see it all over the board. Same phrasing "trust".

I myself wonder how the kip fan club will function or think without his posts.

You think by taking somebody else down you can climb a little? It probably won't work.
 

ImTheScientist

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 2, 2012
Messages
3,726
Reaction score
64
Scottemojo":2ms9uxdh said:
T-Sizzle":2ms9uxdh said:
Basis4day":2ms9uxdh said:
Exittium":2ms9uxdh said:
I'm happy to hear this news more for the fact since we released M.Rob our run game IMO to me has looked like its taken a significant hit. M.Rob's become like the Ying to Lynch's Yang and's become apparent especially when half the time you can sense lynch doesn't trust our rookie Fb's running opposite of them or avoiding them all together.

Whether it's true or not, i don't recall hearing this sentiment until Kearly (pretty sure it was Kip) wrote it. Now i see it all over the board. Same phrasing "trust".

I myself wonder how the kip fan club will function or think without his posts.

You think by taking somebody else down you can climb a little? It probably won't work.

Not sure who or what you are talking about. Kip is great, I enjoyed his opinions even if I didn't always agree. Others took them as gospel......I found that a bit odd.
 

Exittium

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 27, 2012
Messages
3,081
Reaction score
57
T-Sizzle":1izkpyag said:
Basis4day":1izkpyag said:
Exittium":1izkpyag said:
I'm happy to hear this news more for the fact since we released M.Rob our run game IMO to me has looked like its taken a significant hit. M.Rob's become like the Ying to Lynch's Yang and's become apparent especially when half the time you can sense lynch doesn't trust our rookie Fb's running opposite of them or avoiding them all together.

Whether it's true or not, i don't recall hearing this sentiment until Kearly (pretty sure it was Kip) wrote it. Now i see it all over the board. Same phrasing "trust".

I myself wonder how the kip fan club will function or think without his posts.


Keep attacking and assuming that I made my observation by reading someone's thread (once again assuming that I even read), when anybody watching the games can clearly see for themselves whats going on. And its also pretty obviously between last year and this year our teams running game has taken a few steps back. And holy hell I used the word Trust, a word very commonly used in many situations when players have to rely on each other.
 

ImTheScientist

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 2, 2012
Messages
3,726
Reaction score
64
Exittium":2251mca9 said:
T-Sizzle":2251mca9 said:
Basis4day":2251mca9 said:
Exittium":2251mca9 said:
I'm happy to hear this news more for the fact since we released M.Rob our run game IMO to me has looked like its taken a significant hit. M.Rob's become like the Ying to Lynch's Yang and's become apparent especially when half the time you can sense lynch doesn't trust our rookie Fb's running opposite of them or avoiding them all together.

Whether it's true or not, i don't recall hearing this sentiment until Kearly (pretty sure it was Kip) wrote it. Now i see it all over the board. Same phrasing "trust".

I myself wonder how the kip fan club will function or think without his posts.


Keep attacking and assuming that I made my observation by reading someone's thread (once again assuming that I even read), when anybody watching the games can clearly see for themselves whats going on. And its also pretty obviously between last year and this year our teams running game has taken a few steps back. And holy hell I used the word Trust, a word very commonly used in many situations when players have to rely on each other.

We use a FB about 30% of the time. If Lynch carries 20 times in a game that is 6 carries with a FB. So 3 carries he doesn't trust his FB? 6 carries with Mike Rob will be the difference? I think it has more to do with injuries along the line, adjustments made to playing the zone read, and adjustment to how teams play Wilson then 6 carries a game.
 

scutterhawk

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 11, 2010
Messages
9,826
Reaction score
1,797
T-Sizzle":22xnx87d said:
Basis4day":22xnx87d said:
Exittium":22xnx87d said:
I'm happy to hear this news more for the fact since we released M.Rob our run game IMO to me has looked like its taken a significant hit. M.Rob's become like the Ying to Lynch's Yang and's become apparent especially when half the time you can sense lynch doesn't trust our rookie Fb's running opposite of them or avoiding them all together.

Whether it's true or not, i don't recall hearing this sentiment until Kearly (pretty sure it was Kip) wrote it. Now i see it all over the board. Same phrasing "trust".

I myself wonder how the kip fan club will function or think without his posts.
Well now that you mention it, I'm kind of missing Kips' sensible, and well thought out posts, because all we have now is SOME of his detractors chpeiling some of their own opinionated nonsensacle BS to peruse around here nowadays eh? :roll:
 

Seahwkgal

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 30, 2009
Messages
5,128
Reaction score
232
Exittium":2jliziwj said:
I'm happy to hear this news more for the fact since we released M.Rob our run game IMO to me has looked like its taken a significant hit. M.Rob's become like the Ying to Lynch's Yang and's become apparent especially when half the time you can sense lynch doesn't trust our rookie Fb's running opposite of them or avoiding them all together.
Significant hit and yet is 2nd in the NFL for rushing yards......Doesn't look to bad to me.
 

seahawksfanatic000

New member
Joined
Dec 15, 2011
Messages
509
Reaction score
0
Exittium":1pc03hpi said:
T-Sizzle":1pc03hpi said:
Basis4day":1pc03hpi said:
Exittium":1pc03hpi said:
I'm happy to hear this news more for the fact since we released M.Rob our run game IMO to me has looked like its taken a significant hit. M.Rob's become like the Ying to Lynch's Yang and's become apparent especially when half the time you can sense lynch doesn't trust our rookie Fb's running opposite of them or avoiding them all together.

Whether it's true or not, i don't recall hearing this sentiment until Kearly (pretty sure it was Kip) wrote it. Now i see it all over the board. Same phrasing "trust".

I myself wonder how the kip fan club will function or think without his posts.


Keep attacking and assuming that I made my observation by reading someone's thread (once again assuming that I even read), when anybody watching the games can clearly see for themselves whats going on. And its also pretty obviously between last year and this year our teams running game has taken a few steps back. And holy hell I used the word Trust, a word very commonly used in many situations when players have to rely on each other.

We use a FB about 30% of the time. If Lynch carries 20 times in a game that is 6 carries with a FB. So 3 carries he doesn't trust his FB? 6 carries with Mike Rob will be the difference? I think it has more to do with injuries along the line, adjustments made to playing the zone read, and adjustment to how teams play Wilson then 6 carries a game.[/quote]

Maybe we only use the fullback 30% of the time because its not very effective with him. The coaching staff will not run an unsuccessful play often.
 

Recon_Hawk

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 18, 2010
Messages
3,320
Reaction score
468
Location
Massachusetts
T-Sizzle":37bjv1zz said:
kearly":37bjv1zz said:
They are probably testing him for whatever bug he had before, so I'm assuming it's not a routine physical and might require extra time.

Not a bug, it was meds.

Sooooooo out of the loop.
Maybe. Maybe not. He was taking those meds for a reason. If it was for, let's say, a virus of some sort, and he reacted poorly to his prescription drugs, the team will still want to test for that virus.
 

bigwrm

New member
Joined
Sep 29, 2013
Messages
221
Reaction score
0
T-Sizzle":3rtekyu9 said:
We use a FB about 30% of the time. If Lynch carries 20 times in a game that is 6 carries with a FB. So 3 carries he doesn't trust his FB? 6 carries with Mike Rob will be the difference? I think it has more to do with injuries along the line, adjustments made to playing the zone read, and adjustment to how teams play Wilson then 6 carries a game.

Where did you find that 30% figure? Not doubting you, I'd just be interested to see more data on formation tendencies. Also for accuracy's sake, if we use a fullback on 30% of all plays I'd assume the ratio is a little higher for running plays.
 

taz291819

New member
Joined
Apr 30, 2009
Messages
3,626
Reaction score
0
Location
Huntsville, Al
bigwrm":juyznujl said:
Where did you find that 30% figure? Not doubting you, I'd just be interested to see more data on formation tendencies. Also for accuracy's sake, if we use a fullback on 30% of all plays I'd assume the ratio is a little higher for running plays.

Exactly. I've been reading the 30% figure thrown around a lot lately. And even if true, that's 30% of all plays, not just running plays.
 

ImTheScientist

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 2, 2012
Messages
3,726
Reaction score
64
seahawksfanatic000 said:
Maybe we only use the fullback 30% of the time because its not very effective with him. The coaching staff will not run an unsuccessful play often.

That 30% number was last year with mike Rob. You won't see it more this year than last. It's possible we have less FB this year and with Harvin coming I'm guessing even less.
 

ImTheScientist

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 2, 2012
Messages
3,726
Reaction score
64
bigwrm":2m7nf9dt said:
T-Sizzle":2m7nf9dt said:
We use a FB about 30% of the time. If Lynch carries 20 times in a game that is 6 carries with a FB. So 3 carries he doesn't trust his FB? 6 carries with Mike Rob will be the difference? I think it has more to do with injuries along the line, adjustments made to playing the zone read, and adjustment to how teams play Wilson then 6 carries a game.

Where did you find that 30% figure? Not doubting you, I'd just be interested to see more data on formation tendencies. Also for accuracy's sake, if we use a fullback on 30% of all plays I'd assume the ratio is a little higher for running plays.

http://www.fieldgulls.com/2013/8/30/467 ... l-robinson
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top