Here is my one argument with that. If he finishes with those numbers would it be considered good? Yes. Great? No. He can't be good making that money on a team that uses money as an excuse.
Also, and this is my issue, if he gets hot for a month and puts up those numbers but they still miss the playoffs because he was meh for 3 months will that be considered a player that helps us win? Numbers lie. They always have. You can't be a no-show for months of a season then get hot and say he did his job. It just doesn't work in a winning environment. It looks good on the back of a baseball card, but not a winner.
I'd rather have a guy that starts slow and warms up later in the season and hopefully carries that into the post season than a guy that starts off hot and then goes cold September and October. I know we all want consistency, but truth is in baseball that's pretty rare. Even the best hitters are streaky.
We all hate the management and ownership. But that's not a fair argument to why a player has to play above their pay grade. That's not a fair argument at all. I also don't see anyone here taking into account park factor. That means something. Not everyone can be Cal and just destroy everything within reach lol.
I'll say it again. Julio at the plate frustrates me to no end. Sometimes I wonder if he's got an IQ of 5 or something, and it's like he has no plan up there. However, he's a good player being paid fairly. Not being paid to be a superstar even though that's what we'd all love to see. People need to be fair with their evaluations and be able to adjust their expectations when they find out their expectations were just out of wack. I'm sorry that a lot of people expected Julio to be Griffey. He's just not, and that's ok. He's not being paid to be Griffey either.