May 4, 2015 #1 vonstout Active member Joined Apr 12, 2013 Messages 547 Reaction score 79 Might be an option for a bigger WR
May 4, 2015 #2 Mike 4G New member Joined May 9, 2009 Messages 285 Reaction score 0 Could be an interesting option, although the Raiders are awful, so it makes you wonder a little. He probably ends up back in GB for cheap money.
Could be an interesting option, although the Raiders are awful, so it makes you wonder a little. He probably ends up back in GB for cheap money.
May 4, 2015 #3 Basis4day Active member Joined Aug 15, 2011 Messages 5,924 Reaction score 0 He is roughly the same size as Kearse and Norwood and smaller than R. Lockette. At 31 i don't see us being all that interested.
He is roughly the same size as Kearse and Norwood and smaller than R. Lockette. At 31 i don't see us being all that interested.
May 4, 2015 #4 QuahHawk Well-known member Joined Dec 12, 2009 Messages 5,651 Reaction score 126 Location Issaquah, WA I'll pass. Would rather give Lockett and Norwood the reps.I got this feelign like Lockett will be the Veteran WR we needed as a rookie.
I'll pass. Would rather give Lockett and Norwood the reps.I got this feelign like Lockett will be the Veteran WR we needed as a rookie.