It BOUNCED OFF 35 (Neal) hand !!

JPatera76

Administrator
Administrator
Moderator
Joined
Nov 29, 2015
Messages
7,665
Reaction score
6,644
That’s a bullshit call on the refs .. that wasn’t a touchback
 

BigBill1945

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 10, 2011
Messages
4,480
Reaction score
1,180
Player's foot had touched the goal line before he had possession..... Allegedly.
 

Threedee

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 16, 2014
Messages
5,887
Reaction score
993
Location
Federal Way, WA
If it is a TB, did AZ get hosed on the spot of the ball? Illegal block in the back shouldn't take a TB inside the 5, should it?
 
OP
OP
JPatera76

JPatera76

Administrator
Administrator
Moderator
Joined
Nov 29, 2015
Messages
7,665
Reaction score
6,644
So even though Neal (35) (who wasn’t in the endzone) it bounced off his hand making it the 1st player to touch it.. Coleman who did touch the endzone )and was the 2nd player to touch it) can’t touch it?
 

Torc

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 30, 2014
Messages
1,674
Reaction score
2,002
I was confused by that too, but he really screwed up because the ball wasn't moving towards the end zone and a Cardinal was falling on it. It wasn't going to be advanced and he may have touched it without securing it. Easy for me to say, while watching on my TV.....but he should have just been ready to hit the cardinal who grabbed it.
 
OP
OP
JPatera76

JPatera76

Administrator
Administrator
Moderator
Joined
Nov 29, 2015
Messages
7,665
Reaction score
6,644
Looks at the replay it bounced up and down, hit Neal’s hand and then Coleman snagged it.


Coleman wasn’t the first to touch it.
 

UK_Seahawk

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 24, 2013
Messages
4,469
Reaction score
515
Looks at the replay it bounced up and down, hit Neal’s hand and then Coleman snagged it.


Coleman wasn’t the first to touch it.
His foot slipped and was on the line when he touched.
 
Top