
Star RBs meet on Zoom to talk state of position
Several star NFL running backs took part in a Zoom call Saturday to discuss the depressed market for players at their position.
You get paid what you are worth to a organization.![]()
Star RBs meet on Zoom to talk state of position
Several star NFL running backs took part in a Zoom call Saturday to discuss the depressed market for players at their position.www.espn.com
True, but you can make changes to the market that reflect the unique situation that RB's face in the NFL. Mike Florio talks about this a lot. For instance, you can shorten the amount of years a RB is contractually under control of the team that drafts them before they become FA's. There's some other good ideas out there.You get paid what you are worth to a organization.
These men will be financially set up for the next stage of their lives.
What they want is to be paid millions more than they are worth to teams around the league. Is it rough to be a running back right now when you can't be paid what you think you are worth? Sure, but this is a supply and demand market. When it comes to Running backs the supply has almost always out weighed the demand.
Youth will always drive the RB market, as it is one of the few positions in football where ability can compensate for lack of experience.
Good luck telling all other positions they have to change the bargaining agreement so that they can be under team control longer than RBs because they are somehow more special. Want to raise the value of RBs in the NFL? have fewer coming out of college, have fewer playing the position in high school, by telling them they can make more money at another position or sport.True, but you can make changes to the market that reflect the unique situation that RB's face in the NFL. Mike Florio talks about this a lot. For instance, you can shorten the amount of years a RB is contractually under control of the team that drafts them before they become FA's. There's some other good ideas out there.
You can make changes in a new NFLCBA. And it's not that RB's are more special. It's that they have shorter careers due to the type of punishment they take in comparison to a QB, CB, S, WR... That's a big reason why teams can wield more economic control over that position relative to other positions.Good luck telling all other positions they have to change the bargaining agreement so that they can be under team control longer than RBs because they are somehow more special. Want to raise the value of RBs in the NFL? have fewer coming out of college.
Average NFL Career is 3.3 years.You can make changes in a new NFLCBA. And it's not that RB's are more special. It's that they have shorter careers due to the type of punishment they take in comparison to a QB, CB, S, WR... That's a big reason why teams can wield more economic control over that position relative to other positions.
Nice dodge. That didn't at all address what I wrote.Average NFL Career is 3.3 years.
Main reason, it's hard to stay in the NFL.
Much like every other job, you get paid what a "Company" values you at.
Opinion noted.Nice dodge. That didn't at all address what I wrote.
You can't make changes in a new NFLCBA without the players collectively agreeing on said changes. And if you think players in all the other position groups are going to make an adjustment to how RBs are treated because of "the type of punishment they take in comparison to a QB, CB, S, WR...", then I don't think you're being even a little realistic. You can say it's not that RBs are more special, but that's how everyone else in the league would see it.You can make changes in a new NFLCBA. And it's not that RB's are more special. It's that they have shorter careers due to the type of punishment they take in comparison to a QB, CB, S, WR... That's a big reason why teams can wield more economic control over that position relative to other positions.
So when Walker goes through this same thing with the Seahawks down the road, will you say the same thing about him?And if they don't like it, they can learn a different position. The victim role is used up.
There are some positions that could well stand to earn less to make RB contracts more fair. Some positions are over valued.
IDK what provision there is in a contract, if a player becomes injured and unable to play? There ought to be though (if there isn't). Not that they don't get paid, but that it be reduced, if they are unavailable, for ANY position.
I just don't see how it makes sense for a guy to pull his full salary when the team gets nothing, and he's out of commission. Isn't like 50-75% more fair (mind you these are huge numbers)? IDK, many will say I'm crazy, but it makes sense to me.
If you wanna' feel sorry for millionaire athletes, have at it. Walker isn't complaining. Until then, I'm not gonna' even think about it. But I like how you ASSUME he will hold out.So when Walker goes through this same thing with the Seahawks down the road, will you say the same thing about him?