Great Listen: Daniel Jeremiah + The Huddle

[chris98251]

Cool. Anyone else want to come verbally bash me in my face with more gotcha's?

Are you inviting to be kicked in the face while rolling on the floor and curb stomped afterwards, sounds a bit Kinky and more smack shackish. But what the hell, I'm sure I have some pent up stress and frusteration I can let out, The Colts game however was would not be the reason, everything leading up to it was spelling the type of game we had, tough win last week, at least the first half and not really showing we dominated as much as we did, was missing the gotcha element. Rivers coming out of retirement to save the day and everyone laughing him off, their injuries. It was a look past them game on many accounts, we survived, stats looks way in our advantage by the end, but not how the game played out.

 

[glenwo2]

Are you inviting to be kicked in the face while rolling on the floor and curb stomped afterwards, sounds a bit Kinky and more smack shackish. But what the hell, I'm sure I have some pent up stress and frusteration I can let out, The Colts game however was would not be the reason, everything leading up to it was spelling the type of game we had, tough win last week, at least the first half and not really showing we dominated as much as we did, was missing the gotcha element. Rivers coming out of retirement to save the day and everyone laughing him off, their injuries. It was a look past them game on many accounts, we survived, stats looks way in our advantage by the end, but not how the game played out.

Don't threaten me with a good time.

 

[SoulfishHawk]

Go Hawks?

 

[LeveeBreak]

@LeveeBreak *gentle (if I may be the Grammar Police here)

Thanks...I looked at it when I wrote it and said "that doesn't look right", then convinced myselft it was. Trust your gut.

Then you came by with basically what amounts to an "I told you so" which isn't verbally bashing but it is a bit irritating (still deserved, though).

Nah...more me justifying my admiration for JD. Out of all the pundits, he reviews the tape himself, knows what he's looking for, and provides informed decisions. IMO, that's a rarity in the profession. And he's wrong sometimes as well...but not as often as the @$$heads portraying themselves as know-it-alls.

I'm not making any more predictions on any game 'cause NOTHING MAKES ANY FRIGGIN' SENSE.

Speaking from experience, my gut opinions are wrong ~50%+ of the time, so tend to avoid stating them as facts (or can be interpreted as such). Too many out there looking to feed their internet ego's by "bashing" wrong proclimations.

Cheers!

 

[LeveeBreak]

11-3 is nothing to shake a stick at. I've never understood that saying...........

I'm not the only one...good to know. WTF is the origin of that term.

I was gonna hit post reply and then thought "ok you lazy ba$t@rd, you can google it". Here's what google says:

The origins are unfortunately uncertain and there are a few theories, bit one seems more logical than most. The phrase is certainly an Americanism and the first known use of it to mean an abundance was in 1818, in the Lancaster Journal of Pennsylvania; “We have in Lancaster as many Taverns as you can shake a stick at”

So google doesn't really know either.

 

[SoulfishHawk]

Thanks Levee, for helping the even more lazy me.........We lernt sumpin today.