SoulfishHawk
Well-known member
No doubt. One of those no no nooooooooo…..yesssssss Plays
Ruminator":1puutu3s said:SoulfishHawk":1puutu3s said:Dak is def. better than I've given him credit for over the years. He's legit imo. Jury is still out on how he is at end of big games. But he's a damn good player. And that last play, that was an athletic play he made. That looked like a sure sack.
Rarely am I happy when an attempted sack by Seahawks' D fails, but I sure was then. It forced Dak to heave the ball in a flustered hurry, resulting in the INT. Otherwise, they would have had 4th and long and a final shot at scoring a TD that would have sent the game into OT.
seabowl":nzszjyqh said:Ruminator":nzszjyqh said:SoulfishHawk":nzszjyqh said:Dak is def. better than I've given him credit for over the years. He's legit imo. Jury is still out on how he is at end of big games. But he's a damn good player. And that last play, that was an athletic play he made. That looked like a sure sack.
Rarely am I happy when an attempted sack by Seahawks' D fails, but I sure was then. It forced Dak to heave the ball in a flustered hurry, resulting in the INT. Otherwise, they would have had 4th and long and a final shot at scoring a TD that would have sent the game into OT.
Even if they got the sack the clock was down to.like 4 seconds i believe so it would have run.out.
SoulfishHawk":3oh6cc1k said:Dak is def. better than I've given him credit for over the years. He's legit imo. Jury is still out on how he is at end of big games. But he's a damn good player. And that last play, that was an athletic play he made. That looked like a sure sack.
Ruminator":5sdh8qy9 said:seabowl":5sdh8qy9 said:Ruminator":5sdh8qy9 said:SoulfishHawk":5sdh8qy9 said:Dak is def. better than I've given him credit for over the years. He's legit imo. Jury is still out on how he is at end of big games. But he's a damn good player. And that last play, that was an athletic play he made. That looked like a sure sack.
Rarely am I happy when an attempted sack by Seahawks' D fails, but I sure was then. It forced Dak to heave the ball in a flustered hurry, resulting in the INT. Otherwise, they would have had 4th and long and a final shot at scoring a TD that would have sent the game into OT.
Even if they got the sack the clock was down to.like 4 seconds i believe so it would have run.out.
Had Dak actually been sacked, the clock would have stopped with at least 10 seconds remaining.
Shanegotyou11":ljdi2jyk said:Ruminator":ljdi2jyk said:seabowl":ljdi2jyk said:Ruminator":ljdi2jyk said:Rarely am I happy when an attempted sack by Seahawks' D fails, but I sure was then. It forced Dak to heave the ball in a flustered hurry, resulting in the INT. Otherwise, they would have had 4th and long and a final shot at scoring a TD that would have sent the game into OT.
Even if they got the sack the clock was down to.like 4 seconds i believe so it would have run.out.
Had Dak actually been sacked, the clock would have stopped with at least 10 seconds remaining.
They had zero timeouts. The smart play would of to throw ball away.