Comparing Geno to Love doesn't provide any revelations.
From what i have seen for the past two weeks, The Packers and Ravens secondaries are sure tacklers. The best I have seen this year. For Green Bay, the sure tackling by their secondary is what actually keeps them in the game. Love wasn't their best player on the field today. Their secondary was. If you want to compare Seattle and Green Bay, that is where you need to start. Especially because Seattle has so much more invested in their secondary (both in salary and draft capital) than Green Bay does. In that respect, it is nonsensical to debate Geno verse Love. Further, when comparing quarterbacks, unless you are including the relative terms of their contracts in the comparison, I find it to be an ill-informed argument. Almost juvenile. It is ALWAYS about bang for the buck. If the quarterback is delivering at the level of his contract, then it is elsewhere on the team that is underperforming relative to their contract.