bestfightstory
Well-known member
- Joined
- Apr 30, 2009
- Messages
- 8,591
- Reaction score
- 62
HawkWow":1dw3r7k2 said:A generous portion of betting money comes from the casual fan. Casual fans have historically bet with reckless abandon on teams like SF, Dallas, GB and more recently, NE. Additionally, Vegas gets many more visits from people from SF than they do people from Seattle. I don't think we are as good (this week) as we were when we trounced SF. I think Kaep and SF are a bit better.
I believe we win simply because, as Sports hernia states...there is team with the same HFA as Seattle. I wouldn't pay attention to the line on this game. Just bet the team you think will win. If you're correct, You'll cover.
Sports Hernia":25cmy1ij said:HawkWow":25cmy1ij said:A generous portion of betting money comes from the casual fan. Casual fans have historically bet with reckless abandon on teams like SF, Dallas, GB and more recently, NE. Additionally, Vegas gets many more visits from people from SF than they do people from Seattle. I don't think we are as good (this week) as we were when we trounced SF. I think Kaep and SF are a bit better.
I believe we win simply because, as Sports hernia states...there is team with the same HFA as Seattle. I wouldn't pay attention to the line on this game. Just bet the team you think will win. If you're correct, You'll cover.
Oh, no doubt about it! I think SF is slightly better on offense then they were last year, but their D is going to take a sizeable step back this year IMHO!
kearly":3ixlfaj8 said:So if the line is -1 Seattle, and the Seahawks end up winning by exactly one point, do all the gamblers get their money refunded? How does that work?
Tical21":3hau1i7j said:Rule #1 of sports gambling = don't bet on the NFL.
bestfightstory":1rp9damq said:Tical21":1rp9damq said:Rule #1 of sports gambling = don't bet on the NFL.
Incorrect.
drrew":9a0eipmw said:The line is all the way down to -1. It opened as high as -4.5 so there's a lot of money coming down on SF. I'm hoping it keeps moving and I can actually just take the money line on the Hawks win.
I understand the 49ers offense looked good last week, but I'm not sure what people saw out of their defense that makes them essentially the favorite in this game.
NinerLifer":2i4zfe5b said:drrew":2i4zfe5b said:The line is all the way down to -1. It opened as high as -4.5 so there's a lot of money coming down on SF. I'm hoping it keeps moving and I can actually just take the money line on the Hawks win.
I understand the 49ers offense looked good last week, but I'm not sure what people saw out of their defense that makes them essentially the favorite in this game.
Perhaps maybe because there is a difference between Aaron freakin' Rodgers and Cam Newton.
Seriously!
Cartire":tiaaseg6 said:NinerLifer":tiaaseg6 said:drrew":tiaaseg6 said:The line is all the way down to -1. It opened as high as -4.5 so there's a lot of money coming down on SF. I'm hoping it keeps moving and I can actually just take the money line on the Hawks win.
I understand the 49ers offense looked good last week, but I'm not sure what people saw out of their defense that makes them essentially the favorite in this game.
Perhaps maybe because there is a difference between Aaron freakin' Rodgers and Cam Newton.
Seriously!
Hmmm, I seem to remember holding Aaron freakin' Rodgers to 12 points in our house.
And a huge difference between CAR defense and GB defense. Protip: one sucks donkey testicles.
Allowing GB to score 28 points on you in your house, do you guys even know football?
NinerLifer":3p1fzku1 said:Cartire":3p1fzku1 said:Hmmm, I seem to remember holding Aaron freakin' Rodgers to 12 points in our house.
And a huge difference between CAR defense and GB defense. Protip: one sucks donkey testicles.
Allowing GB to score 28 points on you in your house, do you guys even know football?
Your 12th man held Rodgers to low points in your house.
We don't have the HFA you guys have. You don't get out much do you?