MizzouHawkGal
Well-known member
Dallas is to be respected but as I say their defense isn't good enough and they will turn the ball over. Romo can't help it and Murray has fumbling issues neither is a good mix when facing the Seahawks. It won't be ridiculous but as I picked in Aros's thread 34-17 Seahawks sounds about right.pehawk":1btlfa60 said:MizzouHawkGal":1btlfa60 said:Not really any concern given you're posting seriously. Anyway I worry about Murray also but I really think our saving grace will be the fact that both Murray and Romo will turn the ball over at the worst time most likely. It's just what they do.pehawk":1btlfa60 said:Meh, not as much boasting as it is reporting what I've seen. It's still Garrett and Romo, so, I like the Seahawks chances. But, that offensive line is legit. And, Murray's got good enough tools to utilize that line.
XOXO
Moderator Concern Over Pehawk Posting Again
I hope I never post seriously.
This is a message board, it should always be fun. Cancer and war are serious, this is a bunch of nerds talking football. If I ever do post seriously, I hope I get stricken with SARS, ebola, or stomach cancer....because I'll deserve it.
Sgt Largent is spot on in the difference between the OLs faced. Plus, the one balanced team the Hawks faced, they lost to.