Finally nailing the refs and NFL - DeflateGate timeline

SalishHawkFan

New member
Joined
Apr 30, 2009
Messages
5,872
Reaction score
0
So here is what we know:

November 2014 - The Colts intercepted two Brady passes and both times found the ball to be deflated. They took these balls to their equipment manager (notice that they did not go straight to the refs who were responsible for ensuring that the balls were legal and had the ability to force the Pats to provide legal balls, more on this later) and in turn filed a complaint with the NFL.

The NFL responded that they were now aware of the situation and would be monitoring it closely.

January 2015 - the refs tested the balls prior to the game, just as they had done last November. For an entire half, the refs did not check to see if the balls were inflated - though they'd become aware of the issue two months previously and were supposedly "monitoring" the situation. Not until yet another interception occured and the ball was found to again be deflated and the Colts AGAIN did not bring this directly to the refs attention but AGAIN went over their heads straight to the Chief of Football Operations were the refs FINALLY made to check the balls at halftime, where they found 11 of 12 balls to be significantly deflated and at the end of the game, where they found the same results.

No Colts balls were deflated, thus ruling out environmental effects.

The refs handle these balls every single down. Gerry Austin, in an attempt to divert media investigation into possible collusion of the refs and the Patriots to ignore the rules, pointed out that:

while referees do handle the balls later in the game between plays, that is such a small amount of time that it would be nearly impossible to notice.

"You don’t even give that a thought. The amount of time you’re handling the ball is very limited," Austin said to ESPN.
ABC NEWS

The amount of time the refs handle the ball may be very limited, but when you already have an issue the NFL has promised to monitor closely, please explain how the NFL is supposed to monitor the situation other than by having the refs be aware of it and having them take the time to actually look for it.

The Colts player had the ball for a small amount of time. It wouldn't take more than a second or two to feel the ball and notice the difference. Did the refs at any point take just a moment to feel if the ball felt flatter?

No, they did not. It was another example of concious non-calls by the NFL referees. It was another example of the NFL referees holding Tom Brady to a different standard of rules enforcement than the rest of the league.

No wonder the Colts defenders bypassed the referees all three times they caught the Patriots cheating.

They've built a very strong case of referee bias.
 

Sports Hernia

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 30, 2009
Messages
44,755
Reaction score
3,372
Location
The pit
Not surprised "IF" it is found out to be true, we'll wait and see I guess. It's not looking good for the Pats or the NFL at this point though.
 

loafoftatupu

Active member
Joined
Apr 30, 2009
Messages
6,398
Reaction score
11
Location
Lake Tapps, WA
JHC... this is national news now? Like ABC national?

The Colts were on this and essentially kept somewhat of an eye on it themselves. They noticed and had a second chance to check it out.

Crazy.
 

Lagartixa

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 6, 2020
Messages
1,812
Reaction score
3,173
Location
Taboão da Serra, SP, Brazil
A deflated ball is easier for receivers to catch, but also easier for defenders. It's a wash.

Yes, but...

  1. The quarterback had hands that were too small to grip the ball reliably at full within-the-rules inflation pressure; and
  2. Underinflated balls are harder to fumble. And the Patriots had ridiculously low fumble rates. Players that fumbled more with other teams before going to the Patriots saw their fumble rates go down. Players that left the Patriots suddenly forgot how not to fumble and saw their fumble rates go way up.
It's not a wash.

Both the head coach and the quarterback knew the rule about ball inflation, just as the head coach knew the rule about filming opponents' walkthroughs. Patriots fans like to say the team wasn't really cheating, and that these were just minor technical violations of rules. In both cases, Belichick and Brady decided the additional outside-the-rules competitive advantage was worth the risk of getting caught breaking the rule. Gaining a competitive advantage outside the rules is the definition of cheating.
 

projectorfreak

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 9, 2022
Messages
474
Reaction score
307
Location
Western State
So his balls were a little undersized and the ref didn't see fit to grab em with his hand and squeeze to discern weather too soft too hard or , just right
Hmmmmm,,,,
Might need more investigation
Those balls are probably way too old now to do a proper interrogation and gain any tangible evidence200
Shouldn't they have a doctor look at that
Not really my area of expertise but when in rome ?
 

Latest posts

Top