oldhawkfan
Well-known member
Cowherd is interviewing Pete right now.
ivotuk":1jtt9f9u said:Love his show on espn radio. It makes the morning drive to work entertainingI like how he's not afraid to say controversial things and not emulate ths overly PC shows that the rest of the guys on espn radio put out.
oldhawkfan":104vwgbg said:ivotuk":104vwgbg said:Love his show on espn radio. It makes the morning drive to work entertainingI like how he's not afraid to say controversial things and not emulate ths overly PC shows that the rest of the guys on espn radio put out.
Overly PC? You mean Pete Carroll is on other shows and its a bad thing?:lol:
Pick6":russ3len said:oldhawkfan":russ3len said:ivotuk":russ3len said:Love his show on espn radio. It makes the morning drive to work entertainingI like how he's not afraid to say controversial things and not emulate ths overly PC shows that the rest of the guys on espn radio put out.
Overly PC? You mean Pete Carroll is on other shows and its a bad thing?:lol:
PC is politically correct.
Sarlacc83":1gkx6foq said:Pick6":1gkx6foq said:oldhawkfan":1gkx6foq said:ivotuk":1gkx6foq said:Love his show on espn radio. It makes the morning drive to work entertainingI like how he's not afraid to say controversial things and not emulate ths overly PC shows that the rest of the guys on espn radio put out.
Overly PC? You mean Pete Carroll is on other shows and its a bad thing?:lol:
PC is politically correct.
I am pretty sure if you look closely at his comment, you'll find that he was teasing you.
What an ignorant idiot!m0ng0":2jo93ufb said:he just picked the Texans to win this week
Tical21":wkl16s14 said:I liked him at first. He has these really deep original thoughts, and communicates them very well. I judge these personalities based on how often they dismiss normal thinking and instead create their own. The problem....he always misses the point. He will go on and on about a part of a story and you realize that he doesn't understand the real crux of the issue, and never hits on it, instead focusing a huge rant on an unimportant part of it. Unlistenable IMO.
yeastmode":2neabiwv said:Tical21":2neabiwv said:I liked him at first. He has these really deep original thoughts, and communicates them very well. I judge these personalities based on how often they dismiss normal thinking and instead create their own. The problem....he always misses the point. He will go on and on about a part of a story and you realize that he doesn't understand the real crux of the issue, and never hits on it, instead focusing a huge rant on an unimportant part of it. Unlistenable IMO.
The whole 'missing the point' stuff is on purpose. It's a simple device intended to create superficial interest by polarizing opinions either strongly for or against his premise. It's just shallow, basic schtick - be slightly off the mark loudly to goad people into correcting you. In all my radio listening over the years I've found the least talented and least interesting hosts are those that rely exclusively on this tactic as he does. The one that takes the cake is some spare host out of Chicago I happened to be listening to years ago back when Ripken broke 2131. He said the record was not a significant accomplishment because Ripken was just showing up for work every day, which is what he was paid to do...and then immediately invited listeners to call in and prove him wrong. All I heard was "My ratings suck. I'm desperate. Please listen to my fail show." Cowherd does that patronizing crap every day and quite honestly I don't understand why he has a job. It probably says more about ESPN than it does about him.
Intelligent ones like Sherman or Wilson don't they thrive on adversity and challenge.Sarlacc83":2uy6i1fn said:Pick6":2uy6i1fn said:oldhawkfan":2uy6i1fn said:ivotuk":2uy6i1fn said:Love his show on espn radio. It makes the morning drive to work entertainingI like how he's not afraid to say controversial things and not emulate ths overly PC shows that the rest of the guys on espn radio put out.
Overly PC? You mean Pete Carroll is on other shows and its a bad thing?:lol:
PC is politically correct.
I am pretty sure if you look closely at his comment, you'll find that he was teasing you.
Cartire":2onqzf4x said:yeastmode":2onqzf4x said:Tical21":2onqzf4x said:I liked him at first. He has these really deep original thoughts, and communicates them very well. I judge these personalities based on how often they dismiss normal thinking and instead create their own. The problem....he always misses the point. He will go on and on about a part of a story and you realize that he doesn't understand the real crux of the issue, and never hits on it, instead focusing a huge rant on an unimportant part of it. Unlistenable IMO.
The whole 'missing the point' stuff is on purpose. It's a simple device intended to create superficial interest by polarizing opinions either strongly for or against his premise. It's just shallow, basic schtick - be slightly off the mark loudly to goad people into correcting you. In all my radio listening over the years I've found the least talented and least interesting hosts are those that rely exclusively on this tactic as he does. The one that takes the cake is some spare host out of Chicago I happened to be listening to years ago back when Ripken broke 2131. He said the record was not a significant accomplishment because Ripken was just showing up for work every day, which is what he was paid to do...and then immediately invited listeners to call in and prove him wrong. All I heard was "My ratings suck. I'm desperate. Please listen to my fail show." Cowherd does that patronizing crap every day and quite honestly I don't understand why he has a job. It probably says more about ESPN than it does about him.
For that very reason, it's why his talk show is so huge. And also why skip bayless has amazing ratings. You may hate it, but that shtick is ezactly why their ratings are so high.
http://cdn16.castfire.com/audio/303/211 ... -0.48b.mp3DontRussellWithMe":3ftkieax said:Can anyone post a link of the interview?